Talk:M (fragrance)

Commercial section[edit]

what do u mean it has no significance,the part about the beat in the commercial being one of the beats of one of the songs on her upcoming album..is notable...and significant...and should be mentioned...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimibianca (talk • contribs)

It may be worth to mention in the article for the song (if it exists) that the music is used in such-and-such commercial but the description of the commercial is completely unencylopedic unless the commerical itself is notable for something. Every single commercial ever made had some kind of music featured in it so that in itself does not make it notable. I doubt that you really understand what notable means seeing that you use the term often and incorrectly. Perhaps you should familiarize yourself with WP:N. SWik78 (talk) 21:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

but that piece of information is significant(noteworthy) and it is worth mentioning...and should be mentioned.....if its worth mentioning on the article of the song ,then its worth mentioning here to.......Mimibianca (talk) 21:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on M (fragrance). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]