Talk:MR-C

Is the only source for the information on this page a video game? 68.252.163.12 02:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the Crye website. 220.235.5.170 02:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is an actual conceptual design commissioned for the United States Army. However, other than the video game and pictures on Crye's website, all information on whether it's actually moved into prototype/testing stage is classified.

What version of the game is this article reffering to when it states that the MR-C is the default weapon? If I recall, the PC version has the SCAR-L as the default assault rifle.

I know someone who has family working in the US military's weapon research fields, and the MR-C is, of course, not a true-to-life absolute design idea for the Army's next rifle. However, a Modular Rifle-Caseless (as the name MR-C stands for) is the frontrunner design for the next rifle, because as you all know the XM8 was cancelled last year. So yes, there is a high chance that by 2011, you will see a MR-C type rifle in the hands of the Army's infantryman.

Unless we see a big leap in caseless tech that's not going to happen.

And here it is November 2012 and we're still using the tried and true M4 carbine with the only designs being considered to replace it are conventional carbines such as the ACR and HK416 using run of the mil brass-cased 5.56 NATO. As cool as it is, I highly doubt anything will come of Crye's MR-C design within the next 25 years (at least). The Tom Clancy games as of late have a nasty habit of jumping the gun when it comes to equipment and tech featured within (EndWar, anyone?). I'm still waiting for that helmet-mounted flip-down night vision lens that was so prominently displayed on Mitchell's helmet in Ghost Recon 2. Spartan198 (talk) 13:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MR-C. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]