Talk:M23 motorway

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Highways: United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.
	This article's junction list has been marked as needing attention.

Surrey Low‑importance

	Surrey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why the removal of miles from junction list?[edit]

In this edit I added miles to the junction list. They were later removed, along with another column in the table. The article has since been fully protected as part of some, apparently, on-going dispute - so I cannot restore my good work.

As WP:UNIT states that the main unit for road distances in UK articles should be miles, with kilometres following in parentheses - as per my edit, I propose to get an administrator to restore my edit. Does anyone disagree with that course of action? -- de Facto (talk). 17:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will object unless miles and kilometres are in separate columns as per WP:RJL. My reason for objecting is based primarily on the concept that if two sets of reading are mixed up in the same column, then people will not read either. The objective in adding the kilometre column is to catalogue junctions in terms of the displays on driver location signs (which I personally use quite often when I am driving). I appreciate that some readers might like to see the miles column to help them plan any journeys, so if somebody wants to add the miles I will not stop them. Martinvl

The additions complied with WP:UNIT, which says that distances in UK articles should be in miles, with kilometres in parentheses after if desired. Once my edit has been restored, you can take the kilometres off if you think it'll look better. But your reason for objection is, I believe, insufficient to prevent restoration. -- de Facto (talk). 17:54, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, please continue this discussion on WP:RJL as that is where everybody else is discussing things. (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is better for generic WP:RJL business; here is better for the content of this article, surely? -- de Facto (talk). 17:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The reason you were reverted wasn't the information, it was the presentation, which is a concern of RJL. However, there seems to be no opposition to including them so long as its in a separate column. The convert template displays units, which eliminates the advantages of a table (putting the units in the header row). - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 18:01, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Floydian, WP:UNIT states the km should be in parentheses after the miles (like I added it). I used the {{convert}} template to avoid the tedious task of converting and entering the miles again manually. Do you support restoration? -- de Facto (talk). 18:05, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think WP:UNIT needs an application of WP:IAR in this case since we're dealing with a table of repetitive variables and not prose. The "mi" and the "km" take up horizontal space that is otherwise already limited. However, just having 62 (100) could be confusing. I'd suggest a mi and km column next to each other, then each cell needs only include a number, and not the units. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 18:13, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The header "mile (km)" covers the column contents - the columns only contain "1.0 (1.6)", etc. {{tl:convert}} can also do 2 proper table columns (if we choose to ignore WP:UNIT), but because of the non-RJL-compliant 2-numbers-per-cell mess employed in this table, convert cannot be used properly (we'd need to use it twice per row!). We could eliminate the km values - and actually comply with WP:UNIT (and use convert to do the work) or have just one value per row (average them) or have 2 table cells (rows) per junction row and use convert. -- de Facto (talk). 18:24, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussions and decisions about the content of this article are taking place elsewhere[edit]

I've discovered that the content of this article is currently being discussed at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Road junction lists#M23 revocations (18 Nov 2011). -- de Facto (talk). 17:46, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on M23 motorway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

M23[edit]

The information says it starts from Hooley but it should say “Horley” 80.229.148.163 (talk) 06:12, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]