Talk:Méthode pour la Guitare

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

It is true that Coste revised Sor's treatise. However, 'travesty' means to 'make ridiculous' - too strong a viewpoint in this case and one not supported here by any citation. Nevertheless I personaly agree will Gregory that Coste's 'improvements' were a diservice to his teacher's legacy, if not to his memory. RichardJ Christie 10:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with you completely. Napoleon Coste's version presents numerous stunning miniature pieces (that take into consideration the progression of technique). I find it extremely disturbing that people are critical of Coste: As if Sor belongs into some museum! Sor himself has written in his method, that he does NOT explain how things MUST be done (in art there is no MUST), but that he simply explained what has worked for him; and that he will hold it in much higher esteem if the reader use reason (rational reasoning) to form an own valid opinion, than a blind following of a "teacher".
Coste's revised work is thus Coste's take and it's brilliant! (So is Sor's - and Coste would have thought the same, and the mentioning of Sor is a sign of respect!) MySorAccount (talk) 19:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, Fernando Sor in Catalan is Ferran Sor Catalanreader83.32.59.37 (talk) 18:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Méthode pour la Guitare. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100407211504/http://www.tecla.com/catalog/0389.htm to http://www.tecla.com/catalog/0389.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]