Talk:Ménage à Troi

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Star Trek Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Increased Plot Depth[edit]

Several of the edits recently added to the plot by User:212.153.139.117 and User:MetalViking666 have added detail which I feel is excessive for an article already carrying a "This is just plot, add more other stuff" tag. For instance;

Why do we need to know that Mr Homn drinks the leftovers?
Why do we need to duplicate that ferengi females don't where clothes?
Why do should the plot describe OO-mong?
Why do we need to know that Wesley at first doesn't recognise the distortion?

And so on and so on. SPACKlick (talk) 12:53, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion. I have been alerted to this thread due to the continued strange edits by 212.153.139.117 (talk · contribs) many of which are indistinguishable from playful vandalism. We may have to globally rollback all of their edits if it comes to that. User:SPACKlick, I could use your help reviewing their edits. Viriditas (talk) 01:20, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]