Talk:Luca Signorelli

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Link[edit]

It seems to me that a link to Last Judgement would be quite appropriate here, to possibly enlighten readers on the subject of a key work by this artist. DES ^(talk) 21:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Date of Brera Flagellation[edit]

The Italian wikipedia page on the image dates it at 1475, not 1480. Which is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.205.145.82 (talk) 14:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Highland Critique[edit]

It would be better to put his alternative names into the opening section, making it easier for people searching for those names to ascertain that it is the same person. The entirety of the article features only a single citation, despite many specific facts that are cited. This means that it’s hard to know which information comes from which source. The article should be citing where it gets each piece of unique information. Additionally, almost half of the sources are by the same author, Sara Nair James. The article features text taken from an Encyclopedia Britannica article, which takes away from its originality and while legal, is somewhat close to plagiarism- the article doesn’t specify which parts of it are adapted from this source, which is troubling. Most of the article is factual in nature, with few chunks that take on much subjectivity. It is relevant to Luca Signorelli throughout, providing important information about his life and his work. The see also section could use some expansion, though the major works list is well crafted. While one source dates back to 1899, most of the information included is not things that have likely changed since then. Mhighland11 (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]