Talk:Lovelight

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lovelight article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Charts[edit]

When adding or updating chart positions please cite where the positions are from. Thanks. -- Underneath-it-All 00:28, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chart trajectories[edit]

I have removed the Mexican airplay single chart trajectory because I feel that it is not a major sales or airplay chart such as the charts in the U.S. or the UK. I also further believe that trajectories shouldn't be included in song articles. There was a discussion (now archived at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Tables for charts/Archive) about this some time ago that concluded that chart trajectories shouldn't be included in song and album articles. I believe that the use of the trajectories go against the "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" policy. They are hard to verify and most of the time not relevant. While many contributers do like to use them, I argue that they should only be used for major sales charts or for charts that the single reached number one or the top five in. -- Underneath-it-All 02:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ABBA[edit]

Guys, this is also an ABBA song. And one of their hits, so it's notable. Thunderhawk89 (talk) 09:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GRATEFUL DEAD[edit]

Love Light, 4/15/70 - Grateful Dead CANT BELIEVE THE DEAD HASN'T BEEN MENTIONED HERE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.205.128.183 (talk) 17:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lovelight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060218015049/http://www.rt100.ro/top-100-edition.html to http://www.rt100.ro/top-100-edition.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]