Talk:Louis Untermeyer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untermeyer as an editor of poetry[edit]

I don't know how to work it into the article, but I've encountered him as an editor of poetry; the libraries I've browsed have had a number of his volumes. Amusingly (or insightfully) enough, his collection of Modern American Poets included the work of him and his wife (Untermeyer, Jean Starr). Some of the information from the top Google searches could also be worked into the article.--Prosfilaes 05:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Louis Untermeyer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:03, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Critic?[edit]

The first numbered footnote, in support of describing Untermeyer as a critic, says "See for example his criticism[sic]" of one of Wallace's poems in Harmonium. Seems inadequate. First of all, does this note belong in the first paragraph, which is supposed to be a summary? Second, when I looked at the internal link, it seems to refer to an editorial dispute between Stevens and Untermeyer about shortening a poem's title, which hardly qualifies as literary criticism. Third, I have made this mistake myself, in my day, but isn't it contrary to wikipedia's policies to use internal wiki references as footnotes? On the whole, I think this article needs to be more encyclopedic in tone and content. Mballen (talk) 18:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]