Talk:Lok Ma Chau
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lok Ma Chau article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
General[edit]
Does anyone have an opinion on this article?
1) The article has a template justifiably added to the beginning pointing out that the article doesn't have any sources 2) The article doesn't have any structuring that would be provided by section headers 3) The intro says Lok Ma Chau is a village. The pic in the info box has text, "Most of the area in Lok Ma Chau is wetland." Hence, is Lok Ma Chau a village, an area or both? 4) Depending on the answer to question 3, what is the scope of this article?
Any help is appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.148.34 (talk) 15:01, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
- I am not sure, but may be "Lok Ma Chau" is the name of the area and a village? I really need to have some research by reading 北區風物志 or the much older 新安縣志. And yes, this article was another mess that previous wiki editor failed to create an article that based on existing literature thus may contain hoax. Matthew hk (talk) 16:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)