Talk:Load bank
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
[Untitled][edit]
Yes, please merge the resistive, reactive and capacitive load bank information. For both practicle and acedemic reasons, the information would be best accesses if were viewed in one article. --Rick 16:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Manufacturers section?[edit]
Is it really necessary to have it? Its becoming a linkspam zone. --Hooperbloob (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- You are right: it has become a magnet. Binksternet (talk) 16:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's gone. A "manufacturer's list" is always a spam magnet in any article and I can't think of a reason to ever include it; Wikipedia is not a directory or shopper's guide. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:40, 24 March 2010 (UTC)