Talk:Livingston International

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Livingston International article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 7 January 2012 by reviewer B.wilson (talk · contribs).

Note regarding COI tag[edit]

A major contributor to this article, BrettTremblay, has self identified that he is an employee of Livingston International and edits on the company's behalf. QuiteUnusual (talk) 11:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not news. I declared that point when creating the article (actually picking up and completing a former AFC) and this was known when I was working with the original editors and approvers who helped ensure that all the content met Wikipedia guidelines and standards, such as NPOV, see [1] as well as the page's own revision history. BrettTremblay (talk) 16:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The COI tag unfairly casts aspersions on this page's content. I am removing the COI tag since the first approach to be used if there is a concern about conflict of interest should be "direct discussion of the issue with the editor, referring to this (the COI) guideline" (see [2]). That discussion occcured two years ago and COI concerns were addressed. Proof of the sustained lack of COI is evident by the fact that I have not interferred with content edits made on this page by other editors. I welcome a discussion but, instead of a tag, I propose submitting this article for peer review [3] or consideration by the Companies WikiProject group [4] or even nomination to the Neutral point of view/Noticeboard [5] BrettTremblay (talk) 16:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Livingston International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]