Talk:Little Joe II

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Doesn't Little Joe II refer to Rhesus Monkeys that included in spaceflight?[edit]

Weren't these spaceflights (Little Joe II) used to test monkeys for "manned" spaceflight in anticipation of human "manned" spaceflight? Did somebody miss something here? Stevenmitchell (talk) 17:45, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, that came before the Little Joe II tests of the Apollo. Bubba73 (talk), 14:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Little Joe 2 was the second flight of the smaller Little Joe (rocket) developed for Project Mercury, about four years earlier. JustinTime55 (talk) 17:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Payloads need clarification and citation[edit]

There are some problems with the payload weights quoted in this article:

  • Contradiction: the infobox says 30,000 lb., while the Launch vehicle development section says 80,000 lb. was specified (really? Why so much?)
  • The definition of "payload" is really unclear, and always needs to specify the destination (orbit, to Moon, etc.) This rocket was only designed for suborbital (simple ballistic arc) flights to a certain altitude. (Also, what altitude? This needs to be specified.) What exactly does the 30,000 lb. number in the infobox mean? A rocket can carry any payload a certain altitude and distance (aka range, which also should be specified), limited only by the difference between the thrust and the weight of the rocket plus propellant.
  • Payloads are given in the flight table. Do these only include the command module? What about the Launch Escape System, which is really a big part of the test payload. (Even though this isn't included in conventional launch payloads because it wasn't carried into orbit, being jettisoned midway through normal flights.) The numbers quoted look surprisingly small. I would expect, for the test to be meaningful, at least the last flights would have included a flight-weight CM (11-12,000 lb) plus the LES (9,200 lb.); total around 20,000 lb. And what exactly is meant by "airframe weight"?

Also: English units need to be included. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Takeoff thrust seems incorrect in the table[edit]

49 kN (~11,000 lbs) for the first two test flights isn't enough to offset the weight of the vehicle. Dcs002 (talk) 11:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Little Joe II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Little Joe II. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]