Talk:List of unions affiliated with the AFL–CIO

A fact from List of unions affiliated with the AFL–CIO appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 September 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the AFL-CIO gained its latest member union when the 265,000-member UNITE HERE reaffiliated on September 16, 2009?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/September.

Wikipedia

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Web site linking[edit]

Providing a link to every single union's Web site runs afoul of Wikipedia:External links in several ways. Under "Important points to remember," #2 says "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article." Under "Official links," "Minimize the number of links" concludes: "Wikipedia does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website. Wikipedia does not attempt to document or provide links to every part of the subject's web presence or provide readers with a handy list of all social networking sites. Complete directories lead to clutter and to placing undue emphasis on what the subject says." Additionally, it runs afoul of WP:LINKFARM and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. In other words, Wikipedia doesn't exist to be a way of finding AFL-CIO member union Web sites. Official sites exist to provide more information on the article. Linking to each union's site doesn't add information to the encyclopedia article discussing AFL-CIO membership criteria, or establish the number or names of member unions (one link to the AFl-CIO site does that). - Tim1965 (talk) 13:13, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, you appear to be correct. And since nearly every item on the list has an article, I can think of no argument for breaking the rule.RevelationDirect (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of unions affiliated with the AFL–CIO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413143055/http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021727991_aporlongshorelockout1stldwritethru.html to http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021727991_aporlongshorelockout1stldwritethru.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on List of unions affiliated with the AFL–CIO. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Affiliated unions by membership[edit]

There definitely should be a table of the 56 affiliated unions by membership. Any objections to that? –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 02:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]