Talk:List of militants fatality reports in Pakistan

Death Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality.

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TerrorismWikipedia:WikiProject TerrorismTemplate:WikiProject TerrorismTerrorism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taliban casualties[edit]

There something wrong... in some battles the sources and the casualties sections agree on a number of taliban losses, but the battlebox have a different number, I have just fixed it. Just Check.--190.118.9.11 (talk) 01:02, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of Taliban fatality reports in Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of statistics[edit]

I see this article has been classified as a list. The purpose of most list articles are to provide either an index of related articles, or information about related non-trivial matters that are not necessarily notable in their own right to warrant a separate article. However, this article appears to stray into being a copy of a list of statistics from a single official source. So I wonder why it is considered important enough to have a separate list article containing statistics about "Militants fatality reports in Pakistan" when Wikipedia does not have an overview article about the "Fatalities of militants in Pakistan", as far as I can ascertain. I am not saying this list should not exist, but I am questioning the need for having a stand alone article for a separate list. Is there not an article this list could be incorporated into, to put these statistics into a better context? - Cameron Dewe (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "... can be found here:" or "This link is to ..."[edit]

This article would be more readable if the phrases "... can be found here:" and "This link is to ..." were omitted or substituted with some meaningful facts. The citation are present to verify the statements made in the article, not serve as an off-website link to more information that is not in the article. If it is not discussed in the article then there is no need to cite the source. If there is relevant further reading on a website then list it as an external link or as further reading, if it has not been cited for other reasons.

Both the Wikipedia Manual of Style and the W3C's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, as well many others concerned with website content best practice, advise against using phrases that advise users to "Click here" or take similar actions. In reality, the action of clicking on the citation number only takes the user to the citation. Users actually need to hover over the citation before they can obtain a link that they can then click on. While such a user interaction is going to be obvious to a user who has a mouse pointing device, it is meaningless to someone who does not, such as someone reading a printed page, using a audio screen reader, or a robotic search engine. While stating obvious facts may be a good idea, this is not required for an obvious user interaction with the website. I think one must assume that some degree of competence has been acquired by readers and they don't need to be told how to suck eggs. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]