Talk:List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

[[List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain|List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain]] ([[Special:Edit/List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain|edit]] | [{{fullurl:List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain|veaction=edit}} visual edit] | [[Special:PageHistory/List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain|history]]) · [[Talk:List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain|Article talk]] ([[Special:Edit/Talk:List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain|edit]] | [[Special:PageHistory/Talk:List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain|history]]) · [{{fullurl:List of international goals scored by Kévin Parsemain|action=watch}} Watch]|noname=yes}}

Reviewer: Joseph2302 (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

This is an automatic fail for many reasons: first of all, stand alone lists are not eligible for GAN, as per Wikipedia:Good article criteria. Secondly the article has been redirected, so doesn't currently exist as a separate article. Notwithstanding that, the article had under 1,000 characters of text, so is stub level. Hopefully the user will check the GA criteria more carefully before nominating in future, in particular noting that list articles are not eligible for GA. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]