Talk:List of food companies

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please consider Paper Boat[edit]

Please consider this company for this list: Paper_Boat Is is an Indian beverage company serving traditional Indian drinks. Vanivenugopall (talk) 07:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)Vani[reply]

Please verify[edit]

Please verify this site ... http://www.imeifoods.com/index_2.html

Since having not bought any products from them, I dare not add the company to the article. If the verification is possitive, please help to add it up.--222.67.216.10 (talk) 08:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are they notable enough to already have an en:Wikipedia article? Astronaut (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki admin, since one of your admin member is abusing your power.....[edit]

Would you please enable a GUEST account, which is a common practice in IT industry, for people to writing articles, as I don't have your permanent login account, which reflects my genuine situation. Thanks --222.67.209.44 (talk) 03:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the discussion at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:User_(computing)#About_the_issue_of_GUEST_login.....

--222.64.221.91 (talk) 03:53, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why not sign up using this link or the link in the top right of every page? Astronaut (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the website of Keen's curry valid....????[edit]

http://www.keenscurry.com.au/

I also would like to know what the relationship is between Keen's and the one above--222.64.219.112 (talk) 01:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The authentic source is via https://www.colesonline.com.au/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=12551&storeId=13551&productId=10311&langId=-1&categoryId=&parent_category_rn=&useropt=browse&shopTabCategoryId=&sourcePage=SITE_SEARCH --222.64.219.112 (talk) 01:57, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add external links to this article. It is not a question of whether the company exists, it is a question of whether they have an article on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a linkfarm and adding links here will not increase the website's rating with search engines. Astronaut (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Info of Gourmet Garden.....[edit]

http://www.gourmetgarden.com/au/

The authentic source is via https://www.colesonline.com.au/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=12551&storeId=13551&productId=31959&langId=-1&categoryId=&parent_category_rn=&useropt=browse&shopTabCategoryId=&sourcePage=SITE_SEARCH --222.64.219.112 (talk) 01:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add external links to this article. It is not a question of whether the company exists, it is a question of whether they have an article on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a linkfarm and adding links here will not increase the website's rating with search engines. Astronaut (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Eatwell foods.....[edit]

the authentic source is via https://www.colesonline.com.au/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=13553&storeId=14553&productId=33571&langId=-1&categoryId=146023&parent_category_rn=145827&useropt=browse&shopTabCategoryId= --222.64.217.219 (talk) 02:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add external links to this article. It is not a question of whether the company exists, it is a question of whether they have an article on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a linkfarm and adding links here will not increase the website's rating with search engines. Astronaut (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Themfromspace, please have a look at this page.....[edit]

List of brand name food products. Why didn't you revert the red writings on this page and purposely remove my writings??? Please explain my these questions. Otherwise, I consider you as a vandalism--58.38.43.131 (talk) 07:06, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I've said a number of times, there must be articles about the companies on Wikipedia for the companies to be included in this list. We are not an indiscriminate collection of information. Please look over WP:SPAM and realise that Wikipedia is not a linkfarm. We don't allow just any links to companies which we don't discuss in an encyclopedic manner, as we are first and foremost an encyclopedia. If you want to promote those links, there are other options for you, such as posting them on Dmoz. If you believe the companies are notable enough for inclusion, please create an account here and then you can write them yourself, but they shouldn't be linked until the articles are written first. ThemFromSpace 01:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bazzar Bread website needs to be validated....[edit]

The authentic source is via https://www.colesonline.com.au/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=13551&storeId=14551&productId=32771&langId=-1&categoryId=&parent_category_rn=&useropt=browse&shopTabCategoryId=&sourcePage=SITE_SEARCH

However, there are no telephone and physical address presented for people to contact, other than the web form. What if the consumer who is not good at English writing but English speaking wants to speak to the vendor? http://www.bazaarbreads.com.au/default.asp?page=/contact+us

The contact info is at this page http://www.bazaarbreads.com.au/default.asp?page=/privacy+policy --222.64.213.243 (talk) 07:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please compare the above with this http://www.goodmanfielder.com.au/contactus/ --222.64.213.243 (talk) 07:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add external links to this article. It is not a question of whether the company exists, it is a question of whether they have an article on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a linkfarm and adding links here will not increase the website's rating with search engines. Astronaut (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the monopoly facts.....[edit]

To my experience, a popular food brand usually can appear in big supermarket chains such as Coles and Woolworths. For some reasons, the online store of Woolworths can not be accessed for the purpose of verifications on those popular food brands--222.67.211.238 (talk) 08:49, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links on this page do not need to be "verified". The criteria for adding a company to this list is whether there is already a Wikipedia article about that company. Astronaut (talk) 10:49, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not true See comment at the discussion section of Doritos

The Asutralia section needs to be validated by http://www.woolworths.com.au/ if one can access to the site. My access is limited by that site--58.38.40.152 (talk) 12:26, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which discussion on Talk:Doritos?
I have absolutely no idea what you mean by "Validation" or "verification". Such a thing is irrelevant and unncecessary. As I said, the companies listed on this page should be notable enough to already have a Wikipedia article. Go write the articles first, then come here and add a link to the article. Astronaut (talk) 19:18, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aeroplane Jelly is based on the following....[edit]

https://www.colesonline.com.au/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=13551&storeId=14551&productId=30085&langId=-1&categoryId=&parent_category_rn=&useropt=browse&shopTabCategoryId=&sourcePage=SITE_SEARCH --222.64.218.44 (talk) 08:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone please verify the site for me please....[edit]

for some reasons, it can not be accessed at my end http://www.hoytsfood.com.au/ --58.38.40.152 (talk) 10:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think that site is in need of "verification"? Astronaut (talk) 19:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A redlink is based on the following....[edit]

http://images.google.cn/images?hl=zh-CN&um=1&newwindow=1&sa=1&q=%E6%B4%BD%E6%B4%BD%E9%A3%9F%E5%93%81+%E7%90%A5%E7%8F%80%E6%A0%B8%E6%A1%83%E4%BB%81&btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%87&aq=f&oq= --58.38.44.119 (talk) 12:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://images.google.cn/imglanding?imgurl=http://img05.taobaocdn.com/bao/uploaded/i5/T1EZddXnNkIkCPUl.Z_033408.jpg_160x160.jpg&imgrefurl=http://store.taobao.com/shop/view_shop-47b15644fee508164a72c81f2196bd5c.htm&usg=__B9GfiuVVD8TA1_thZ6jUm_WYeao%3D&h=160&w=119&sz=10&hl=zh-CN&um=1&tbnid=UE5FgZ-ebZHmwM:&tbnh=98&tbnw=73&prev=/images%3Fq%3D%25E6%25B4%25BD%25E6%25B4%25BD%25E9%25A3%259F%25E5%2593%2581%2B%25E7%2590%25A5%25E7%258F%2580%25E6%25A0%25B8%25E6%25A1%2583%25E4%25BB%2581%26hl%3Dzh-CN%26sa%3DG%26um%3D1%26newwindow%3D1&q=%E6%B4%BD%E6%B4%BD%E9%A3%9F%E5%93%81+%E7%90%A5%E7%8F%80%E6%A0%B8%E6%A1%83%E4%BB%81&sa=G&um=1&newwindow=1&start=0#start=1 --58.38.44.119 (talk) 12:18, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

and

http://www.iqiaqia.com/ --58.38.44.119 (talk) 12:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

food additive labeling issue in China http://www.njzj.gov.cn/fluentoms/site/njzj/article_a200704128699.html --58.38.44.119 (talk) 12:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.shzj.gov.cn/art/2007/8/27/art_19004_42.html --58.38.44.119 (talk) 12:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What? These links are all in Chinese. The first link is a collection of food product images related to the search terms "amber walnut food", the second link doesn't display at all (error: "403 - forbidden"), the third is the official site of the company in the red link, the fourth is totally unreadable (first line is "ʳƷÌí¼Ó¼Á»ù±¾ÖªÊ") but translates as something about food additives, and the last link is something about food labelling (again in Chinese). Apart from the official site, how are any of these links anything to do with the red link added to the article. The red link itself adds nothing to the list and the links supplied above are largely irrelevant. To appear in this list, a company should already have an existing article written about them. Astronaut (talk) 18:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Food additive (antioxidant) labeling of Honey Walnut Meat http://www.sanming.com/en/cp.asp?lid=20071224182841&aaa=071224182820&flag=1&page=2 the doc of 食品标识管理规定 in the above does not mention it --222.64.20.217 (talk) 22:16, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

However, the one of 食品添加剂基本知识 in the above mentions--222.64.20.217 (talk) 22:20, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I Fail to see what this has to do with the addition of the red linked companies you added to the list. Astronaut (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly provide the CAS number of....[edit]

Potassium Naphtha - 山梨酸钾--222.67.209.154 (talk) 02:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC) for the product of http://www.yiminfood.com.cn/product/show.asp?ID=347&ClassID=1 --222.67.209.154 (talk) 02:09, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why is this needed? Astronaut (talk) 13:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As the search engines listed on CAS registry number do not show the Chinese name--222.64.17.90 (talk) 23:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How is the CAS number relevant to a list of food companies? The place to ask your question is one of the reference desks. Astronaut (talk) 00:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UK's red links are associated with the following....[edit]

--222.64.223.42 (talk) 12:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is no better than putting this link on the page. As I said in other discussions above, if Redwood are to be listed they should be notable enough to already have a Wikipedia article. Go write the article first, then come here and add a link to the article. Astronaut (talk) 15:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

US' red links are based on the following...[edit]

--222.67.219.1 (talk) 08:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.219.1 (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.219.1 (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.219.1 (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--124.78.226.83 (talk) 10:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.209.8 (talk) 06:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.209.8 (talk) 06:48, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.209.8 (talk) 06:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.209.8 (talk) 07:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.209.8 (talk) 08:09, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doing this is no better than putting this link on the page. As I said in other discussions above, if these companies are to be listed they should be notable enough to already have a Wikipedia article. Go write the articles first, then come here and add a link to the article. Astronaut (talk) 14:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OZ's red links are based on the following...[edit]

--222.67.219.1 (talk) 09:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.67.219.1 (talk) 09:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doing this is no better than putting this link on the page. As I said in other discussions above, if these companies are to be listed they should be notable enough to already have a Wikipedia article. Go write the articles first, then come here and add a link to the article. Astronaut (talk) 14:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

China's red links are based on the following....[edit]

--124.78.226.83 (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--124.78.226.83 (talk) 09:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doing this is no better than putting this link on the page. As I said in other discussions above, if these companies are to be listed they should be notable enough to already have a Wikipedia article. Go write the articles first, then come here and add a link to the article. Astronaut (talk) 14:46, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

UK's red links.....continued.....[edit]

--222.64.215.115 (talk) 07:45, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The message in the article's edit box is quite clear. Please do not add links like this. As I have said many times above, go write the articles first, then come here and add a link to the article. Astronaut (talk) 08:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian red links.....[edit]

--222.64.215.115 (talk) 07:56, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The message in the article's edit box is quite clear. Please do not add links like this. As I have said many times above, go write the articles first, then come here and add a link to the article. Astronaut (talk) 08:54, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray for Astronaut[edit]

I want to thank Astronaut for his thankless and heroic efforts to maintain this lists criteria. Im sorry we have so many spammers and promoters trying to game the system. I am actually inclined to remove all the links on this talk page, as bad attempts to abuse WP by putting links anywhere. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:24, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for the praise. Astronaut (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2017[edit]

Leahy Orchards Inc. should be added to the list of Canadian Food Companies. Source: applesnax.com 68.67.46.218 (talk) 15:57, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Doesn't appear to have a Wikipedia article Cannolis (talk) 23:14, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
information Note: Marking as answered. JTP (talkcontribs) 23:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2020[edit]

We would like to have our company(s) added to this list under United States: The Neil Jones Food Company; Northwest Packing; San Benito Foods; Tomatek. 206.169.71.251 (talk) 16:16, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does not have a Wikipedia article – Thjarkur (talk) 16:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix[edit]

Please dont delete list of food companies in Indonesia 🙏. Those companies are really from Indonesia Mas Drew (talk) 12:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 September 2022[edit]

India Adyar Anandha Bhavan KaleeswariSivakumar (talk) 08:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 08:53, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 October 2022[edit]

Turkey


additions for Turkey 2003:EC:746:3301:30E4:48C1:5F1D:5361 (talk) 16:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: This page only allows addition of listings for companies which already have wikipedia articles written about them. From your list, I was able to add A101, Banvit, TEKEL, and Ülker. Apikoğlu, Anadolu Efes, and Yıldız Holding were already present. Dimes has a blue link in your request, but there does not appear to be an article for the Turkish company on Wikipedia. Same story for Aytaç. Jiltedsquirrel (talk) 18:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lowe's hardware for food as of now?[edit]

Could someone correct the link to the following for Foods distribution & retail category in the United States of America? It is listing the main Lowe's (hardware) page as that company is bigger but I think should be listed for Lowe's Foods. Last I knew in recent years the hardware store does not and has not had for recent decades have a grocery aisle like Menard's does. Yes there is some history but currently the most relevant is the following link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowes_Foods 68.48.113.58 (talk) 21:46, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]