Talk:List of flags of the United States/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Untitled

Should include the "Appeal to Heaven" pine tree flag -- that was very important in the 1770's... AnonMoos 22:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm working on it. BTW, the flag is more known as 'Washington's Cruisers flag'. - Thanks, Hoshie | Don't Tread on Me 09:44, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

Minor discrepancies

Image Image:Naval jack of the United States (2002–2019).svg is shown twice on the page, and the "City Flags" section speaks of eight flags, but only shows seven... AnonMoos 19:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

I think it's appropriate to list the (so-called) First Navy Jack under both "Flags with similar designs" and "Military flags"; would you disagree? As for the missing city flag, there was apparently a copyright issue with the St. Louis flag image and someone deleted it without fixing the text; I've restored the gallery entry using a different image. --ScottMainwaring 19:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I removed it from "Flags with similar designs", since it was kind of redundant (and it doesn't even have a canton, like almost all the others in that subsection do). AnonMoos 23:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

invisible images

i'm wondering why several flags in the gallery are not being displayed. there's a placeholder, and it clicks-through with to a visible image, but it doesn't show in the article. --emerson7 | Talk 17:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

False Information

You have completely wrong information under "civil flag" that's not even a picture of the civil flag, I have one my great granpa got after WW-I. and that's not it, not close to being it, and THEN your article claims that the civil flag isn't even legitimate. It's BS like this that gives wikipedia a bad name. THEN when searching for information I find a dead link to an article on the civil flag that used to be up here, but was deleted. Go figure. -- 23:57, 13 October 2007) 216.255.15.9

Maybe you could tell us what precisely you think the civil flag of the U.S. is (as opposed to the flag flown by ordinary citizens on land, and by non-governmental ships at sea -- the ordinary meaning of "civil" flags, but in the the case of the U.S. both identical with the national flag; and as opposed to the mutant version of the U.S. customs flag which is used to illustrate a fringe conspiracy theory on the article page). 18:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnonMoos (talk • contribs)

On oren neu dag's flags

I'm not sure we should have 2 flags that were just made by a user when they have no historical basis whatsoever. He just.. made them. On the computer. I mean, they're very nice, but I'm not sure we should have it on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.236.208.61 (talk) 04:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

They do not belong, but then again, none of the ones in that section belong here. Someone should try creating a seperate page named. "Fictional Flags of the U.S.A." for thoseAladdin Zane 05:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Well, at least with the other flags there's a connection in some form to something else that could be on Wikipedia. I don't think we should allow flags somebody just alternatively makes. I'm thinking of deleting them right now, in fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.236.208.61 (talk) 06:32, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually the others are just as ficticious too, they are not real flags.Aladdin Zane 06:39, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Proposed, supposed, or fictional designs

Why is this section here? As they are not flags of the U.S.A. they are all fictional flags with no basis for being here. If someone else doesn't take them off. I will be doing it soon.Aladdin Zane 05:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

The recently added Oren Neu Dag image was apparently personal to him, and so somewhat irrelevant, but a number of the other images in that section have various degrees of interest for various reasons (one being a design produced by a branch of the U.S. government as a possible design for a 51-star flag), so deleting them all en masse isn't all that helpful. It would be better to discuss individual reasons for why individual images should be ommitted... AnonMoos 13:57, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
This article is about actual flags of the U.S. not proposed flags, feel free to create a seperate page of ficticious flags of the world. To link back to here.Aladdin Zane 23:04, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
To quote from the introduction to the page, "This is a list of flags used in or otherwise associated with the United States." Fictional, proposed, and supposed flags of the U.S. may not be in actual use, but they are nonetheless associated with the U.S. and thus on-topic, no? --ScottMainwaring 02:01, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
No they aren't associated with the U.S. They are associated with television shows, and associated with proposed movements. And to try and say they are misrepresents the whole page in itself. As wiki is an encyclopedia. And not an Editorial on proposed flags of movements, that aren't likely to happen or fictional TV shows.Aladdin Zane 02:34, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Whatever. Until and unless you give give SPECIFIC reasons for removing EACH individual image in particular -- instead of just indiscriminately deleting all of them en-masse promiscuously -- then I consider that you're not acting in a cooperative and constructive manner to collaboratively improve the content of this article. AnonMoos 16:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The reason given covers all of them. They are NOT real flags, nor are they associated to the U.S. in any way. They are proposed flags for movements, that will in all probaility never come true. And fictional flags on fictional tv show. They in no way should be included in an encyclopedic article. As this is an encyclopedia. I will remove them again. You need to give and actual basis for these FAKE flags being on this page.Aladdin Zane 16:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

You may think it adequately "covers all of them", but others disagree, and if you want to replace unconstructive edit-warring with substantive factual discussion, then you should give a specific particular reason for each particular specific image. 17:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
It is you that need to provide substantive factual reasons for each individual one to be on the page. Along with valid citations. None of which have been provided. And will be deleted until provided.Aladdin Zane 23:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Aladdin Zane, would you please hold off further deletions until a consensus is reached? To try to respond to your points: (a) If by saying these flags aren't "real" you mean they have no official status, and likely never will, I don't think anyone is disagreeing with you. There is no reason that notable unofficial flags should not be covered by an encyclopedia, however. (b) You say that these flags are not "associated with the U.S. in any way". Why do you think this? It would seem on the face of it that in each case, the designer of the (proposed/supposed/fictional) flag is rather explicitly intending that a viewer would associate the flag with the U.S. national flag. I.e., you persist in claiming these flags are off-topic for this page by not being "U.S." associated, but don't explain why you make this counter-intuitive claim. (c) If it's really notability (or lack thereof) that is bothering you, then please discuss this on a case by case basis. Though my own opinion is that all of these flags is notable enough to justify the rather limited space (in absolute or fractional terms) they take up in this list of flags. --ScottMainwaring 05:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
None of the are ASSOCIATED with the U.S. in any way and should stay removed, until they are proven to be ASSOCIATED with the U.S. with valid citations and (wiki itself is not a valid citation) If you can provide this info feel free top add them back.Aladdin Zane 13:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean by "ASSOCIATED with the U.S. in any way"? For example, are you claiming that there is no intended association between the 51-star proposal by the US Army and the current US National Flag? I am trying to start a good-faith discussion with you, but the imperial tone of your proclamations here is not helping me understand your reasoning, Aladdin Zane. --ScottMainwaring 14:46, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
What do I mean by ASSOCIATED? "Flags of the United States---This is a list of flags used in or otherwise associated with the United States." Those flags are not ASSOCIATED with the U.S. they are associated with movements.Aladdin Zane 11:23, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
If Image:US_flag_51_stars.svg is used in Flag_of_the_United_States#Future_of_the_flag, why can't it also be used in this article? AnonMoos 10:23, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
A citation wasn't used for it there either, and it should be removed, thanks for telling me.(wiki itself is not a valid citation) I will take care of it. Also Puerto Rico is not the 51st state, because it declined becoming one, so that imaginary flag is pointless.Aladdin Zane 13:27, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
It would be nice if you could give meaningful specific explanations for your preferred state of an article, instead of just being apparently motivated by some kind of delete-mania. The probability that Puerto Rico will become a state in the next 5-10 years is low, but nevertheless, if an agency of the U.S. government has made preparations for the possibility of a future 51-star flag, then there's absolutely no reason why Wikipedia can't include this. See http://flagspot.net/flags/us51star.html etc. AnonMoos 00:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
You just proved my point even more. It is NOT a flag, and not likely to ever be one. This is an encyclopedia, and wiki isNOT a Crystal Ball. Also the site you provided is not a valid citationAladdin Zane 00:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
By the way, Wikipedia has a specific template -- Template:FOTW -- for citing the FOTW... AnonMoos 13:38, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Actually that site is a valid citation - it's a mirror of Flags of the World. And that 51 star flag really does exist, it just has no official status other than being the Army's official proposal. I don't understand why you say it is "NOT a flag". --ScottMainwaring 05:14, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
It is just a proposal of what the flag should look like if Puerto Rico ever becomes a state. In fact both of those flags are proposals of what each group THINKS, the flag should be changed too. If Puerto Rico ever becomes a state, there is NO guarantee the U.S. would use either of those proposals. So basically they represent NOTHING, and also they are NOT ASSOCIATED with the U.S. in any way, They are ASSOCIATED with movements. Why am I bringing up the word associated? Because of the main purpose of the wiki page which clearly states. "Flags of the United States--This is a list of flags used in or otherwise associated with the United States"Aladdin Zane 11:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Dude, the 51-star flag design was not based on the practical politics of Puerto Rico. It was a contingency plan for the addition of a 51st state, no matter what that state might be (and it appears from FOTW that in fact designs with 51 through 56 stars were drawn up). Furthermore, CAPITALIZING words whose intended meaning in the context of this discussion seems rather obscure to other people does not do anything by itself to clarify their meaning. AnonMoos 15:11, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
You just said it yourself "It was a contingency plan for the addition of a 51st state"Aladdin Zane 16:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, and there's no valid reason seen so far as to why such a contingency plan can't be mentioned in this article. It has a much stronger official connection to the U.S. government than other flags whose presence in the article you haven't objected to, such as Image:Adbusters_Flag.png and Image:Uspeaceflag.png... AnonMoos 22:41, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Dude -- 1) That site references a National Geographic article as its source. 2) Your naive metaphysics concerning things which allegedly "exist" and do not "exist" is simply not helpful for the purposes of this discussion. It would be far more constructive to give a reasoned argument for why you want things to be a particular way, rather than making flat bald assertions that something is "NOT A FLAG" (whatever that's supposed to mean). AnonMoos 07:53, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
So you're telling me you do NOT know what a flag is?Aladdin Zane 11:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
No, I'm telling you that your "folk existentialism" is not adding anything positive to the discussion of how to improve the article page. AnonMoos 15:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

FAKE flags still need VALID citations, (and wiki is not a valid citation) The supposed United States 51-star flag (proposed by U.S. Army Institute of Heraldry) had no valid citation, and even if you went to the wiki page provided, it also had no citation for this flag, or even a picture). The supposed United States 51-star flag (proposed by New Progressive Party of Puerto Rico) supposed flag, that had no valid citation, even if you went to the wiki page, it was linked to there was no image of the flag provided with circle of stars, or citations on the page linking to one.) The supposed United States Civil Flag (supposed by some groups to be the legitimate flag) supposed flag from a fictional movie, has no assciation to the U.S , and no valid citations proving it did. The supposed Flag of a post-atomic United States (fictional, from the Jericho episode "Why We Fight") supposed flag from a fictional tv show, has no assocition to the U.S), and no valid citation proving it did. The supposed Flag of United States of Earth (fictional, from Futurama) supposed flag from a fictional tv show, as it has no assocition to the U.S), and no valid citation proving it did. Provide valid citations with pic of the flag and proof of association to the U.S. and I will not delete them. Do the work to back up your claims and they stay. If you can't, they stay of the page til you can. And remember sites of original research are not allowed as valid citaionsAladdin Zane 12:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

1) None of the flags on this page has "citations" in the sense you're requesting. The only citations on the article page are to flag rankings in a survey (not to individual flags).
2) Your "explanation" for your deletion action repeats pretty much the same text for each removed flag (making it relatively hard to read), and this repetitious text also heavily relies on the word "association" -- a word which is apparently deeply personally meaningful for you, but which has been shown in the context of this discussion not to be able to intelligbly convey your intended meaning to other people. AnonMoos 20:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Not true, the flags that are supposed to be here, you can find citations for their flags on their state or county pages. The word "association" is a key word in the heading of this article. As has been stated. If you find one without one, It should be deleted until one can be found Aladdin Zane 21:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Arbitrary break for Fictional flags, etc

I remoevd one flag (the Futurama one) which doesn't automatically mean the USA anyway. I also split the section, as there is a very large difference between 'proposed' and 'fictional.'—ScouterSig 15:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

What's with the Red and white striped/barred flags section?

I got here through the anti-americanism article because someone added the flag with 50 corporate logos. WTF is going on on this page? We have official US flags on the same page as madeup flags, that anyone could conger up??? I can't believe that this is allowed! --THE FOUNDERS INTENT TALK 15:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

And then there's that "Jesusland" flag which as far as I can tell was made up entirely by Oren Neu Dag, as admitted by himself in the image article. Yes, it's based on that ridiculous meme whose article is well outlined on Wikipedia, but it seems like he just up and chose to make a flag about it, with no basis for it from the spread of the meme. - 70.245.47.17 (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Seems like a strange section...espcailly as some of the flags are older than the US flag itself. Did the founding fathers have a time machine then? 78.105.230.196 (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Are you referring to the "Other flags of U.S. origin" section? -DevinCook (talk) 18:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Pax cultura.svg

The image Image:Pax cultura.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:04, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Examples

Is it really better to show only six or eight "examples" of state, county and city flags, than to not show any and include only a hatnote linking to the full lists? The current choice of included flags is rather arbitrary: the best-designed few flags according to two NAVA surveys for the states and cities, and presumably completely arbitrary ones for the counties. SiBr4 (talk) 21:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Having read the dispute over Fictional Flags..

i just want to briefly include this Fictional Flag Sentineling Rotational for consideration, when the time comes, to ∆⇌ the U|S Flag to be more hharmless and more future-proof.ed.

The Public has editorial access to this Folder. No restrictions, so please keep Calm⁴mentaries ∱age. It would be cool to see a renovation to the Rollback Originals.

Flag burning would be the third stage, after Rotation or a subtle Rotated Inversion, visible based on the ⏣ off-centering.

Google Drive'ed, with Public Edit Rights — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamtheclayman (talk • contribs) 01:16, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Regarding Claims of Hello Internet Vandalism/Repeated Removal of A Proposed US Flag of Greater Notoriety than the one from Puerto Rico

To begin with... The flag is clearly known to 3 million subscribers to CGP Grey (Likely more given those that otherwise partake of his media) In comparison the adult population of Puerto Rico is only 2.5 million. So no, that flag is not lacking notoriety if we insist the other proposed one belongs.

This is not vandalism and it is rude of some users to claim such without even trying to check if the proposed flag truly lacks notoriety or not. 73.96.114.150 (talk) 06:14, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

The flag clearly does not belong in that section, because it is not an example of a flag with more than 50 stars. Its inclusion is part of a long-term vandalism campaign by the hosts of the podcast Hello Internet. Please stop adding it. —Granger (talk · contribs) 11:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
Dismissive much? You are wrong on at least two accounts in your response here. The first one being the claim of a long term vandalism campaign by the hosts of Hello Internet... There is no such case there however some people, rightly so, can clearly argue that stuff said on that podcast can be notable, especially given the notoriety of its hosts. The second one being your claim that the flag does not belong because it does not have more than 1 star. That is not the case at all, as nowhere are flag proposals defined as having more than 1 star anywhere and it is clear that this flag is at least as notable as some random flag from Puerto Rico's progressive party. Again, this flag is equally notable and what reason is there to exclude it while including less notable ones given it is indeed a proposed flag? 2601:1C1:8002:CF5B:6496:CF82:8C29:691A (talk) 06:05, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

secessionist flags?

I know throughout US history there have been separation movements. Would it be possible to put these flags on this page? SandyPetersen (talk) 09:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Elements about flag origin as mix between Grand Union Flag and personal Washington flag "blue with 13 six-pointed stylized stars"

Please look at Elements about flag origin as mix between Grand Union Flag and personal Washington flag "blue with 13 six-pointed stylized stars"

thank you for any contribute.

--151.18.96.190 (talk) 09:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)


"Revolutionary Americans adopted various symbols to represent the new republic that they created after the Declaration of Independence," said Dr. R. Scott Stephenson, vice president of collections, exhibitions and programs for the museum. "Washington's Standard includes a blue field with thirteen white stars representing a new constellation, which Congress adopted in 1777 as a component of the now familiar 'Star-Spangled Banner.'"
source:
witf.org "George Washington's battlefield flag on view at revolution museum"
(Written by The Associated Press | Jun 14, 2018 12:18 PM )
..It seems that “Hopkinson” flag version, with six-pointed stars, was the first version of the "Star-Spangled Banner"
--151.68.113.56 (talk) 07:07, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

City and County flag sections

Curious why the County flags section and City flags section only display police flags rather than the flags of the city or county? Either this section should be removed or the actual flags of select cities and counties should be displayed. Possibly could use the largest 10 and keep the "main article" link to see more? Gimelthedog (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Fort Mercer Flag

  • If the Fort Sumpter Flag merits inclusion on this page, then consideration ought be given to the Fort Mercer Flag, which is visually similar. Whiteguru (talk) 06:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

How reasonable is it to include 50+ star flags?

After noticing someone changed a picture for a completely different 54-star flag designs, it got me wondering if this is really encyclopedic information. Unless these designs are somehow preliminarily approved as official things, it seems like anything else would be essentially OR. These designs at least need to be supported with citations, I think.

I can believe the 51 star flag is probably approved somehow, but the other ones I can't seem to find confirmation for. Rschwieb (talk) 15:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

I think it's just a "fictional flag" and will only be so until a legislation has passed about possible future states, this is possibly a violation of WP:CRYSTAL but I don't know for sure. PyroFloe (talk) 14:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
@PyroFloe and Rschwieb: I was just looking at this: Smithsonian Magazine heavily implies there is no official design chosen, and its source for the "least disruptive" design, the non-circular 51-state option, is... Wikipedia. I'd argue that, except for the one proposed by the New Progressive Party of Puerto Rico, these all fall under WP:MADEUP, and should be removed. YorkshireLad  ✿  (talk) 14:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Okay, so according to FotW (which I believe is not regarded as a reliable source because it's user-generated), the July 1959 edition of National Geographic Magazine says that flags have been prepared with up to 56 stars. Don't know how relevant that is today, though. I don't have a subscription to the National Geographic archive, sadly, to verify this. YorkshireLad  ✿  (talk) 14:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
OK so possibly they should all be removed. But as a first step I wonder if this edit should be reverted. Not only does it change the design presented, it replaces an svg with a png, which I thought is usually considered the wrong direction (all other things being equal.) Rschwieb (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 4 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Looking at the article myself, this article was laid out less of a history article and more of a list. (closed by non-admin page mover) MarioJump83! 11:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


History of the flags of the United States → List of flags of the United States – The majority of the article is laid out as a gallery list of the flags of the different sectors of the United States government, it's predecessors, military flags, and tribal flags rather than a full historical background or evolution of each flag. Adding to that, the title I'm proposing already redirects here. PyroFloe (talk) 03:13, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome! This has been in my editing list for a long time now so I just went on with it. Cheers! PyroFloe (talk) 14:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:11, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:43, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Should this article include state, county, city, etc. flags?

It adds a lot of clutter and there are already perfectly good articles on State and Territory Flags of the United States, counties, etc. The two are often out of sync, causing confusion. Perhaps a link to those articles is all that should be here and this article should be reserved for flags associated with the U.S. Federal Government. Jbt89 (talk) 04:35, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:22, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_flags_of_the_United_States/Archive_1&oldid=1149895213"