Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Georgia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article[edit]

There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 July 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk) 00:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


List of diplomatic missions of Georgia (country)List of diplomatic missions of Georgia – There is no need for parenthetical disambiguation here; the U.S. state does not have (and would never have) diplomatic missions, so this is not ambiguous. Regardless, the WP:Base name redirects here, which is WP:MISPLACED, and there is nothing to disambiguate it with (i.e. there is not List of diplomatic missions of Georgia (U.S. state)). The proposed move was previously made WP:BOLDly but was reverted, hence bringing to RM per WP:PCM. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:07, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Normally I would oppose this kind of move as ambiguous, but this is one of those cases where it is clearly not. The U.S. State of Georgia doesn't have any diplomatic missions (and I believe that would be unconstitutional, but I digress). estar8806 (talk) 18:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.