This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
While I applaud User:Wwoods for being bold, I am not convinced taht the new layout is quite the right thing to do. My main concern is the lack of sortability (if that's a word)... I feel that being able to list the counties by age/area/population is a useful feature.
I woudl be interetsed to hear other people's thoughts and feelings on the matter. Tompw (talk) (review) 15:58, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think the sortability is key. Plus, that new formatting was much harder for me to read. I've reverted. Geraldk 12:21, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I added Template:New Hampshire County Labelled Map to the article. It is the first labeled map I've made, and I would appreciate any feedback. I felt the previous map was a little too small to be easily readable, but this one looks a little too large to me. Any thoughts? Grayfell (talk) 23:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]