Talk:List of coalfields

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Globalise[edit]

The lead for this article seems to apply specifically to the USA. The lists are extremely weighted.--Derek Andrews 18:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, grab an atlas and expand it! Folks at 137 (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, there's more on the British Coalfields now - I was surprised at the paucity of main artcicles on coalfields in England, Scotland and Wales so I've created a few more stubs. Geopersona (talk) 05:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And have now added more to the list of British coalfields from the British Geological Survey report at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/7456/1/CR06159N.pdf Geopersona (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What it is?[edit]

If this article is a list, it should be named properly (List of coalfields). If not, the listing of coalfields should be removed from this article, and the article should describe only what the coalfield is. In both ways, this article needs to be changed. Beagel (talk) 20:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to List of coalfields. Beagel (talk) 14:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of coalfields. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]