Talk:List of White Star Line ships

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Disambiguation needed[edit]

Most of the blue links in this article lead to dab pages, so someone needs to disambiguate the links. PamD (talk) 07:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-ic suffix[edit]

Was any rationale ever divined for the frequent use of -ic names? 99.40.197.2 (talk) 06:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Belgic[edit]

Belgic 1885 and Belgic 1911 in this list both link incorrectly to a historical article on the ancient celtic tribe Belgae. I have an interest in, and some information about the 1885 ship and intend to submit an article at a later date. Johnsydneydavidson (talk) 04:46, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SS Belgic (1885) article now existsMurgatroyd49 (talk) 18:15, 16 January 2014 (UTC)divine white of kings[reply]

Delete Page?[edit]

Is there any need for this page as it replicates the list at White Star Line? [[Murgatroyd49 (talk) 20:24, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HEY WHITE STAR LINE YOU NICE PEOPLE SHOULD REBUILD THE TITANIC IT WOULD BE AWESOME — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.109.59.100 (talk) 06:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of White Star Line ships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]