Talk:List of Rolls-Royce Merlin variants

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Merlin production numbers[edit]

I checked my books and some good figures about the production totals of individual Merlin Marks; would this be a useful addition to the article, or simply too much detail? Kurfürst (talk) 19:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a bit much for this article but could it be used at List of Rolls-Royce Merlin variants ? MilborneOne (talk) 19:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) Exactly as I was just about to suggest: It could be added to the new List of Rolls-Royce Merlin variants article by all means, a summary of production totals is provided as a footnote in this (Merlin) article. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 19:33, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if it would be practical to add it into that article's table (thanks for pointing out, didn't notice there is a seperate one) - by adding a new columns for each Mark there? Kurfürst (talk) 19:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think adding a column will squeeze the table, how about a separate new table for the numbers built? Can we copy this discussion over to the 'list' article talk page? Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 19:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some in the list, not in the table and vice versaPetebutt (talk) 06:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merlin 140[edit]

No mention of the 140 used on the Sturgeon? 68.148.233.117 (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]