Talk:List of Major League Baseball career OPS leaders

Baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Adam Dunn[edit]

Is there some official definition which justifies including Adam Dunn, whose OPS is under .900 (although it rounds to .900)? Ma^t_chups 01:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Small Sample Size[edit]

Should we include a minimum number of plate appearances? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.163.100.75 (talk) 16:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vlad Guerrero Jr.[edit]

Has hit a 1.002 per Baseball Reference (https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/g/guerrvl02.shtml) though on other sites he's hit a .997 (The Score's app, unfortunately I don't have a way to link) for the regular season.

We may also want to differentiate him from his father as well, once the playoffs are over. Mgraham1985 (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This list goes off a minimum of 3,000 plate appearances. He'll be added once he crosses that threshold. Taffe316 (talk) 16:29, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

redundant denotations[edit]

It's not necessary to have a yellow background AND an asterisk for HOF players, nor to have a green background AND bold the names of active players. So I removed these redundant denotations, a move that was quickly reverted. @WikiMaster2K15, would you kindly explain why you prefer the redundancy? ~~~ PRRfan (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Any thoughts, WikiMaster2K15? PRRfan (talk) 13:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As WikiMaster2K15 reverted the original edit without an edit summary and has edited this page five times without offering an argument against removing the redundant denotation, I will re-remove it. PRRfan (talk) 14:24, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]