This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article was copy edited by Basalisk, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 11 November 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
I just copy edited this article and it is, frankly, horrendous. I've fixed the first season so that it at least reads correctly, but the section on season 2 is a total lost cause. I've boldly removed the vast majority of the plot summaries as, after reading the first 10 or so, it seems to me that the plot lines of any of the episodes from season two would (if summarised to a degree adequate for the purpose of a "brief plot outline") essentially be identical. The plot of this season seems so anaemic – it's basically a chronicle of some lame vampire-vs-werewolf war, poorly conceived and poorly executed – that I don't know if there's any way to construct an accurate summary, much less using reliable sources.
If it is possible to make this article acceptable then it's a job for someone who knows the area well, and who can also write in decent English and is committed to the use of reliable sources. That person is not me, as I fail on count 1. Since the content in its previous form was detrimental due to the horrific standard of writing it was presented in, and the fact that the improvement of this through copy editing is effectively impossible because of the reasons stated above, I have reluctantly removed the content until someone can make a good job of this. Please discuss. Basaliskinspect damage⁄berate 19:42, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
