Talk:List of Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering High‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture High‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering High‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Articles not on ASCE list[edit]

Dropped the following articles; not found in official list at ASCE:

Colorado Street Bridge, Pasadena, California
Espada Acequia (Piedras Creek Aqueduct), San Antonio, Texas
Lincoln Tunnel, New York City/New Jersey
McAlpine Locks and Dam, Louisville, Kentucky
Natchez Trace, through Mississippi, Alabama, and Tennessee
Red Hill Underground Fuel Storage Facility, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii
John A. Roebling Suspension Bridge, Cincinnati, Ohio to Covington, Kentucky
Verrazano Narrows Bridge, Brooklyn/Staten Island, New York City

Brianhe 02:32, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for following article:

Ypsilanti Water Tower, Ypsilanti

Brianhe 21:10, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be some mistake (or confusion) in the 'Colorado' section: Cheesman Dam is NOT in Denver, but while a part of the Denver water supply system is actually in mountains outside of Denver. There is a Cheesman PARK in Denver. Rick lightburn 20:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Missing[edit]

The White Pass & Yukon Route is also designated as an International Civil Engineering Historical Landmark. This happened in the mid 1990s, and was so dedicated during a broadcast by Good Morning America live from Skagway. GBC 02:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Table format[edit]

I think this list should be in the form of a table. Any thoughts?--Marcbela (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:UI-seal.png[edit]

The image File:UI-seal.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No big deal Jerky, I will remove it.--Marcbela (talk) 02:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Done. Term is a proper noun in the sense currently used in the article. If there are other groups that make similar designations that want to get wikipedia coverage, could request a rename to be more specific (...ASCE... or similar) and convert this page to a DAB (or argue about PRIMARYTOPIC as usual). DMacks (talk) 00:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of historic civil engineering landmarks → List of Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks — Move to capitalized spelling for list of proper noun award places named Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks. Note a speedy CFD is in progress to move category back to capitalized, proper noun format as well. | Relisted billinghurst sDrewth 16:06, 16 July 2010 (UTC) | doncram (talk) 10:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Update: the corresponding category name was in fact brought back by speedy rename to be Category:Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks. --doncram (talk) 20:25, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment shouldn't it be List of ASCE Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks ? 76.66.192.55 (talk) 18:29, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support as proposed. The name of this particular designation is a proper noun, not a descriptive phrase, and is always capitalized. "ASCE" is unnecessary because no other organization awards this designation (but that alternative is still better than the current title). Station1 (talk) 21:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think either the current title, or that proposed, are acceptable. Whether capitalised or not, they both give the impression that they are the only historic civil engineering landmarks in the world. I would suggest the somewhat lengthy, but accurate, List of Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks designated by the American Society of Civil Engineers. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What other formally designated civil engineering landmarks are there? Certainly any other should be mentioned at least in a "See also" way. But, does any other civil engineering body use the same proper noun phrase? Of course there are other civil engineering accomplishments which are by now historic landmarks, broadly speaking, but these are all the ones we know of that are proper noun Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks designated by anyone. As nominator, I think the capitalization suffices, and renaming to something more specifically mentioning ASCE should be done later, if/when a competing usage of the same proper noun phrase is found. No need yet, IMHO. But I don't really mind the longer term suggested by Skinsmoke; it is better than the current title. --doncram (talk) 04:13, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What other formally designated civil engineering landmarks are there? For a start there are a number of UNESCO World Heritage Sites that, in their citations, were designated as landmarks in civil engineering. My problem is that the phrase is too vague, with or without capitalisation, unless you qualify who has designated it. The problem then is that you are likely to get additions being made to the list that have not been designated by the American Society of Civil Engineers. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, i see what you're trying to accomplish then. The more specific naming would perhaps help in that function of dissuading other editors from adding inappropriate entries, but i am not sure that is a real problem. If the list is lower-case it is more of a problem; but we are applying uppercase proper noun labelling now. Also there are other list-articles like those for National Register of Historic Places listings or for U.S. National Historic Landmarks where, yes, other editors do occasionally add items that do not belong. It is not hard to remove those occasionally. You can keep control in this list article by having a column for date and code and reference of the ASCE listing, for which inappropriate additions will be blank and will stand out, calling for deletion. --doncram (talk) 03:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question: What makes you say that they are proper nouns? While one may say that each designation may be considered a proper noun, would a collective list? The plural here would be List of sites or potentially List of sites classified as ..., and then classified by whom? What if other countries have similar classification, are they in or out? I am all for a rename if the list nomenclature is specific, and here I would think something with more clarity would be useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billinghurst (talk • contribs)

Support - the ASCE site uses it as a proper noun, Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks, as Station1 said above. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:43, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as it stands. It is a list of sites or it is a list of ASCE as an organisation. Just determining that an organisation utilises them proper nouns, doesn't mean that it is a proper noun, especially without that organisational clarification. billinghurst sDrewth 13:09, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What are your thoughts on this page (6th bullet point down)? Just curious, it may not mean anything. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 13:40, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This seems stalled. I'm now posting to wt:HSITES to invite more comments. --doncram (talk) 17:27, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per Station1 Niagara ^{Don't give up the ship} 18:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - it's a proper noun and should be capitalized correspondingly. I would also not oppose a move to List of ASCE Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks or List of sites designated as Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks or something like that, but that seems unnecessary. Objecting to the capitalized title because these are not the only civil engineering landmarks in the world that are also historic seems unreasonable to me; it's like objecting to List of black Academy Award winners and nominees because it's limited to the Oscars and excludes other awards bestowed by academies. If it's capitalized, that implies it's referring to something specific, not generic. Propaniac (talk) 17:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

latitude & longitude[edit]

Should we add a column in the table for latitude and longitude? Then a GeoGroup will allow users to see maps of where these are in the click of a button. Or, this information could be included in the location (city) column. MikeVdP (talk) 01:37, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added the landmark coordinates into the location column so they will now work with the GeoGroup template. Transpoman (talk) 02:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of Historic Civil Engineering Landmarks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:36, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Update to ASCE Landmark listing ...[edit]

Copy edit of ist to bring current to the end of 2019. Cheer Risk Engineer (talk) 15:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:National Historic Landmark which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:17, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]