Talk:Linear referencing

Sigh..........

Look at this edit. That's why I put the "context" tag there. Someone's come down with a really bad case of déformation professionnelle. If this is about geography or geodesy or cartography or something like that, it needs to say so in the first setence. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

...consider to be less arrogant ("really bad case of déformation professionnelle"). As you see, a series of people have been working on it. Just improve the article if you don't like it. Regards, Bumbulski (talk) 06:50, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

IMPROVED This article appeared to have a bit of a bias against LRS and for GIS, but they are both useful tools and have pros/cons depending on the context and goals. For example, there was a "Limitations" section, but no "Benefits." I plan to find more sources to back stuff up, but I know from experience that there is a rich history of using LRS and many benefits over using GPS for certain application including better accuracy and lower cost, which is why most engineers I speak to still prefer LRS. Nothingisnecessary (talk) 00:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Linear referencing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425232647/http://gs-web.geomapgis.com/web1/tiki-index.php?page=Routes to http://gs-web.geomapgis.com/web1/tiki-index.php?page=Routes
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720074856/http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/vital/research/pubs/200204-LRsynthesis.pdf to http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/vital/research/pubs/200204-LRsynthesis.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100623120248/http://ggs.gmu.edu/People/Curtin/LinearRef.pdf to http://ggs.gmu.edu/People/Curtin/LinearRef.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 16 May 2017 (UTC)