Talk:Lilydale to Warburton Rail Trail

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Victoria / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Lilydale to Warburton Rail Trail is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV and Weasel words[edit]

On two occasions (1984 and 1996) the state government attempted to sell off the land only to be thwarted by locals who saw the opportunity to create a linear reserve, which could have great environmental and economic advantages for the towns along the route, not to mention the enjoyment of the general public.

This paragraph is POV and contains weasel words. How was the attempt to sell off teh land "thwarted"? Woudl it be better to say that locals protested and the decisions was reversed? (if that is in fact what happened). "Great environmental and economic advantages" is relative and subjective. Should be substantiated with a reference. "not to mention the enjoyment of..." is unencyclopedic tone. Don't get me wrong, I'm a fan of rail trails, but this article could do with a tidy up. It read like it has been written by the rail trail support group. - A random bike rider. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.26.235.14 (talk) 00:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lilydale to Warburton Rail Trail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717224704/http://www.visitvictoria.com/displayObject.cfm/ObjectID.0000F89F-71FA-1A6B-B64F80C476A901F2/vvt.vhtml to http://www.visitvictoria.com/displayObject.cfm/ObjectID.0000F89F-71FA-1A6B-B64F80C476A901F2/vvt.vhtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]