Talk:Lilya 4-ever

Estonia Low‑importance

Lilya 4-ever is part of WikiProject Estonia, a project to maintain and expand Estonia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.EstoniaWikipedia:WikiProject EstoniaTemplate:WikiProject EstoniaEstonia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : WikiProject Estonia/Missing articles
Assess : Rate each tagged article by quality and importance to the WikiProject if it has not been done. (See Category:Unassessed Estonia articles)
Infobox : Add infoboxes to articles without it
Maintain : Portal:Estonia
Photo : Upload and/or add a photo to articles without it (See Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Estonia)
Stubs : Add info to stub-articles and check for start-class.

Film: Baltic / Nordic

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Baltic cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Guuuh. What's the point in having spoiler tags when the penultimate paragraph, which allegedly does not contain spoilers, contains the sentence "Lilja consistently worships the image throughout before smashing it shortly before her suicide"?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.212.29.83 (talk) 09:12, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not exactly Harry Potter, is it? However perhaps they should be put back on; the article is too short to be able to conceal the plot synopsis and ending, perhaps, for them to be of much use but someone flicking to the page who actually wants to see the movie might need them to prevent them reading the page. For me knowing the plot is OK, now I don't have to sit through it. Lstanley1979 (talk) 15:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at it in more detail, I think the two sections should be reversed so that the spoiler is at the point where you have to scroll down to see it. I'm happy to do this but perhaps it would necessitate the "About the Film" section being rewritten so maybe it is a job for more experienced Wikipedia editors. Lstanley1979 (talk) 17:46, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Lilya 4-ever poster.jpg[edit]

Image:Lilya 4-ever poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English phraseology[edit]

. Is it just me, or is the english on this article mediocre at best? Not proper for a wikipidia article. I think we need to revise this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SwedishPsycho (talk • contribs) 12:53, August 23, 2007 (UTC).

I've cleaned it up slightly, particularly substituting "marginalised" for "severely excluded". As a native English speaker I can't see much wrong with the general gist of the article; it depends how technical you want to get though. To all intents and purposes it reads fine. Lstanley1979 (talk) 15:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danguole Rasalaite[edit]

She doesn't obviously have a wiki yet but does anyone have any links to this story in the news? Seems like if she is well known enough to have a film based on her life she is well-known enough to be documented elsewhere. Lstanley1979 (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danguole Rasalaite on Danish Wiki Rune X2 (talk) 09:43, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's in Danish, no one understands. Here's something I found: http://www.interpol.int/Public/News/2006/news20060124Address.asp Othatzsokewl (talk) 05:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Ghosts[edit]

From watching the film, I believe the filmmakers wanted to leave it up to the audience whether or not the Ghost of Volodya was real or a figment of Lilya's imagination. Personally, I viewed Volodya's Ghost as a manifestation of Lilya's guilt and yearning for what she left behind, as horrible as it was. The article should be changed to reflect both explanations. -- John Ryan— Preceding unsigned comment added by John Ryan (talk • contribs) 17:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Criticising soundtrack's composition[edit]

The opinion of Tony Rayns on soundtrack's composition seems to be pretty doubtfull as Rammstein's album Mutter was #1 bestseller in Russia in 2001. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.178.94.233 (talk) 18:20, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]