Talk:Lightning-prediction system
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Description[edit]
The description is very vague and hard to understand. Can you clarify it? Thanks nadav
- Jesus Christ...not merely vague. Fucking atrocious and clearly either written by a PR man or a Ph.D-level electrical engineer. It is almost unreadable. I will fix it. Bullzeye contribs 03:11, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Notification for Speedy Deletion Tag[edit]
This page keeps going back & forth from "lightning prediction system" to "lightning-prediction system", but won't die. -- G4 reason for speedy deletion.
It is clearly marketing one specific product, sourcing as a reference its use at a specific location. The subject matter is clearly & extensively covered here... Lightning_detection so what is the point of this page? I would suggest moving anything of unbiased value or use over there promptly.
It is an obvious candidate for Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion and I will tag it for such.
It is a clear violation WP:NOTFORPROMOTION -- G11 reason for speedy deletion. Borealdreams (talk) 01:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- I notified the original author on their talk page, and there has been no response. I am tagging the article for Speedy Deletion as the article's subject matter is covered in more depth without single sourcing to one specific product here. Borealdreams (talk) 01:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Challenge[edit]
WP:UNSOURCED ENTIRE ARTICLE Njlaw (talk)Njlaw —Preceding undated comment added 12:32, 10 October 2018 (UTC)