Talk:Li Xiucheng

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

Horrible[edit]

This article is terribly written. I couldn't get any sense of it.

Kuhlfürst (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Same here ! Sounds to me like some automatic translation from Chinese.90.2.130.109 (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Exactly my thoughts. How can such a terrible article exist on Wikipedia? Colipon+(Talk) 19:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Appears like a Google Translate-esque machine conversion. Needs a serious and thorough WP:CLEANUP, bad time. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 00:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing[edit]

This is poorly expressed. Why say Queen Victoria's "cousin's brother"? I suppose that it's accurate, since he had two sisters who were the queen's cousins, but why not just say that it was given to the queen's cousin, the Duke of Cambridge? As for him then giving it to his brother's daughter, he had no brother, so it's not clear what this can mean. One sister had a son, and the other had three sons and a daughter (who later became Queen Mary). — Preceding unsigned comment added by PTheroff (talk • contribs) 18:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up the English so that it at least makes sense (I used to do Chinese-to-English translations often, so many of the errors were familiar). I can't do anything about the lack of cited sources at this point, though. Sanfordstreet (talk) 05:00, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]