Talk:LiMux

Linux Mid‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Munich Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Munich, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Munich on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MunichWikipedia:WikiProject MunichTemplate:WikiProject MunichMunich articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Screenshot horribly outdated[edit]

At http://www.channelpartner.de/i/detail/artikel/3043464/1/2569742/EL_mediaN100BA/ there is a lot more recent sceenshot, which likely is a lot more representative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.59.157.255 (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tone / NPOV[edit]

"Like the fall of the Berlin Wall, LiMux signals to public and private decision makers around the world that life beyond the existing order is possible."

This sentence seems very biased; should we really be comparing the LiMux Project to the fall of the Berlin Wall..? Removal/rewrite necessary? Apollosfire 04:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no...[edit]

The poetry, the grandeur! It's about computer operating systems ffs.

and no, I'm not going to sign my comment. Ban my ip if you wish —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.181.74.22 (talk) 23:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Mistake about the distro ?[edit]

I am just noticed that's the article speak about SuSE instead of Debian... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.221.150.88 (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why not tell the truth?[edit]

Why not edit the article and state plain and simple that this migration never happened and it's an utmost failure? Chances are that every single of those 14K machines have been replaced more than once in the last 8 (eight) years, yet they are still running Windows. This article is misleading and reflects a certain partiality amongst some of Wikipedia's authors and editors.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.62.208.238 (talk) 22:36, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps there was a development in 2011 that led you to believe that Munich scrapped the project, but later reports evidence that it is thriving. –Ringbang (talk) 00:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

old screenshot[edit]

As far as I know the current environment is KDE 3.5, isn't there a newer screenshot? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.54.111.76 (talk) 15:07, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on LiMux. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline[edit]

"This section is in list format but may read better as prose", says the article. Surely not! It is fine as it is.--Brian Josephson (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a chronological list is better as a list than a narrative.

Currently the last entry is 2020. An update would be appropriate. Thx, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 14:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]