Talk:Leo and Diane Dillon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comments from a Wikipedia reader[edit]

A Wikipedia reader has sent the following comments to the Help Desk:

Actually, the Dillons were illustrating the interiors of influential magazines such as Galaxy, as early as the late 1950's, well before Harlan Ellison became an influence in S-F circles, in the mid to late Sixties.

They, along with Emsh, Dick Powers and (occasionally, for his intermittent cover art with F&SF) Chesley Bonsetell were the premier SF artists, of their day (Kelly Freas has to be mentioned because of his multiple Hugos for illustration but the above, I believe, deserve merit for what they did in the formative boom years of the mid-20th century.

I remember, in the nineties, attempting to contact them, for an interview, as I resided in the same neighborhood (Kane Street, in Cobble Hill, Brooklyn) as they.

Thanks for your work on the article. Capitalistroadster 23:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Editing Done To This Article on 12 September 2006[edit]

I made extensive changes to the article on Leo and Diane Dillon today, 12 September 2006; the work is not complete, and I will return to complete it as soon as possible. I have been friends with the Dillons since 1989. During a recent visit, I showed them the Wikipedia entry about themselves, which included the line, "Leo is of African-American descent, and Diane is of Jewish descent". At Diane's request, I removed this line, given that she told me she is not of Jewish descent, and is therefore inaccurate.

The entries under the headings Education, Freelance Work, Picture Books, Chapter Books, Awards, Memberships, Courses Taught, and Publications About the Dillons, were extracted from information in the Dillons' personal database of their work, with further editing by me to verify the information, including authors' names. All of the bibliographic information in the article can be verified by searching databases such as OCLC's WorldCat Beta, which includes catalogue records from over 1.3 billion items in over 18,000 libraries. As an academic librarian myself, I have access to the full database, known as OCLC WorldCat, which along with my own collection of the Dillon's illustrated works, I used to further verify the bibliographic information in this article.

I would appreciate any feedback or comments, and I will advise the Dillons of the progress made editing this article.

Podbay 06:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leo's death[edit]

I see no news about Leo Dillon dying on May 26, 2012. I'm removing it until an obit appears. --RayneVanDunem (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps the two incomplete references to Harlan Ellison and Spectrum Fantastic Art can be deleted now.
If the quotation of Ellison is deemed noteworthy here, which seems reasonable to me, it should be moved out of the reference into the text.--P64 (talk) 01:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Authority control data[edit]

Leo at Library of Congress Authorities --a useful catalog entry point

Diane at LC Authorities

--P64 (talk) 20:46, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added templates {{Authority control}} to the personal redirects Leo Dillon and Diane Dillon. --P64 (talk) 15:56, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cover art in book articles (Old Kingdom and others)[edit]

According to our book articles, the Dillons illustrated all three Old Kingdom (book series) covers. (Two All three are currently listed here; I wikilinked those two titles and writer Garth Nix today.) Unfortunately the book articles do not make clear whether the Dillons painted the first editions (Australia?) or merely the presumably first U.S. editions. Nor are the three cover images clearly identified by edition or artist. Someone who knows the Dillons work may be able to determine the latter.

One note in this joint biography should cover all book articles that are linked to the list of works, regarding whether cover images in those book articles do or don't show the Dillon cover. (For example, our articles A Wrinkle in Time and 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea do not display the Dillon cover. Only the former is now linked to the Dillon list of works.)

--P64 (talk) 01:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought I drafted a Note and tweaked some of the listings but this needs more attention. --especially regarding the Old Kingdom series where it's possible that the Dillons did illustrate first edition covers or dustjackets. --P64 (talk) 01:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It might be adventageous to mention that Leo and Diane Dillon's artwork may not necessarily appear in non USA editions. Traditionally UK and US books are released with different artwork. For instance "Claymore and Kilt" in its UK version was not illustrated by the Dillons as it is in the US version. Often book dealers use stock images to sell books and you might not get the Dillon artwork version. A minor addition to the article stating that the US first editions are likely to feature the artwork of Leo and Diane Dillon might assist enthusiasts. In good faith, Alex — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.140.132 (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Leo and Diane Dillon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Leo and Diane Dillon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leo and Diane Dillon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Whitewitch.png[edit]

File:Whitewitch.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 21:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Leo_and_Diane_Dillon&oldid=1206973422"