Talk:Lemington Power Station

Lemington Power Station has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 10, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Lemington Power Station/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments:

First instance of acronyms, even "UK", is spelled out.
Don't need to link Newcastle two times so close, same with a few other links. See WP:OVERCAT
It is a bit redundant to, in a reference, first put in the url, then another link to the cite and then the name of the publisher. The first and last are sufficient.
Publishers are proper nouns and therefore always capitalized.
Ref 6 redirects to the main page of the site.

I fixed everything except ref 6, which needs a new url (or archive link). Otherwise it will pass through GA. Arsenikk ^(talk) 20:37, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 6 has now been archived. Is there anything else? Fintan264 (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to be strict on this, but the archiveurl needs to point to an actual archive site. When I search as archive.org, it says this site is not archived due to limitations in robots.txt (meaning the site has not allowed other sites to crawl it). You will probably have to find it in another news source or alternatively ref to the paper addition. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:31, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved from cite web to cite news as the original now broken link took the information from a published news paper. Fintan264 (talk) 23:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then it is approved. Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 10:51, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lemington Power Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051102100737/http://sine.ncl.ac.uk/view_structure_information.asp?struct_id=348 to http://sine.ncl.ac.uk/view_structure_information.asp?struct_id=348

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:39, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]