Talk:Lawrence station (Toronto)

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).

Entrance at 3080 Yonge[edit]

Article text removed:

However, in March 2020, the TTC closed the entrance due to a safety concern, described as "a structural failure of the ceiling", that the TTC is addressing with the building owner. As of October 2020, the entrance remains closed, but the other three entrances at Lawrence station remain available.

The Lawrence station entrance at 3080 Yonge Street reopened sometime in January 2021 (personal observation) after the building owner completed repairs earlier in that month. I cannot find a source on the internet that would confirm my personal observation. Thus, assuming that personal observations are unacceptable, I felt the next best solution was to remove the above text about the 9⁺ month closure. TheTrolleyPole (talk) 01:16, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... that seems like the right move. Temporary closures kinda skirt being minutiae (if we consider whether noting a few months' closure is meaningful 5, 10, 15 years from now) so I don't think "losing" record of this closure is any great tragedy. 🙂 —Joeyconnick (talk) 01:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]