Talk:Laverstock

Wiltshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laverstock and Ford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131111210514/http://www.wyverncollege.wilts.sch.uk/index.html to http://www.wyverncollege.wilts.sch.uk/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 January 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 03:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Laverstock and Ford → Laverstock – We usually don't have articles on parish councils and the name of the village and civil parish is just "Laverstock". The parish council doesn't appear to be grouped so that means that it covers the same area as the civil parish which as can be seen includes Ford. Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. samee converse 20:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Well, the parish council certainly think the parish is called Laverstock and Ford. And they live there. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but the name of the village is just "Laverstock" and we usually create the article based on the village, see Hamstead Marshall for example. And we usually don't have separate articles on the village and parish. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but as far as I can see we don't have an article on Ford. Given the parish puts equal weight on both villages, I can't see why we would move the article just to Laverstock. That would only be justified if we also created an article for Ford. Then I'd support the move. The problem with that, however, would be what we called it, given there's already Ford, Wiltshire, about another village of the same name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The other Ford would be Ford, North Wraxall and this would be Ford, Laverstock. There is Kirkoswald, Cumbria and there was an article at Kirkoswald and Renwick. Similarly Wistow, Leicestershire isn't at Wistow and Newton Harcourt (or Wistow cum Newton). Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 18 October 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per discussion below. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 03:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Laverstock and Ford → Laverstock – Official name of village and parish has precedence over name of parish council. Wire723 (talk) 14:50, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by proposer: Source for the village/parish name is https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/election-maps/gb/

The same move request was made 2.5 years ago by @Crouch, Swale and opposed on the grounds that Ford has no separate article. My research found little notability – a hamlet, farmland and a modern housing estate – therefore I expanded the Ford subsection here instead. Moving this article to its correct name will not prevent the creation of a Ford article in future. Wire723 (talk) 14:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support we use the name of the CP for parish articles and anyway this is a village as well so we use that name for village/parish articles, as noted an article can be created on Ford. Also note per WP:COMMONAME the parish council can call its CP what it wants but often only it and the district council will use it while all other sources will use the OS name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.