Talk:Laurence of Canterbury

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleLaurence of Canterbury is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starLaurence of Canterbury is part of the Members of the Gregorian mission series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 29, 2010.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 9, 2009Good article nomineeListed
March 29, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
April 22, 2009Featured topic candidatePromoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 3, 2020, February 3, 2021, February 3, 2022, February 3, 2023, and February 3, 2024.
Current status: Featured article

older entries[edit]

Was the church he was buried in really named after Augustine of Hippo, not Augustine of Canterbury? The latter seems more likely. --Saforrest 19:53, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations[edit]

Good job..Modernist (talk) 00:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks. Now for Paulinus of York and Gregorian mission and the Featured Topic will be done! Ealdgyth - Talk 00:39, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicious quote...[edit]

Another time, Laurence wrote that the "small number of Celts, living at the world's ends, cannot claim to know better than all the Churches of Christendom."

The above sentence from the article is highly implausible: the pre-Saxon inhabitants of Britain and Ireland were not refered to as "Celts" until the 18th century, some 1200 years after Laurence died. Similarly, the "celtic church" is a modern term. Bede, for instance, refers to British, Scots (i.e. Irish) and Picts. Unfortunately I don't have access to the purported source, i.e. the book by Décarreaux. There is no such quote in Bede, who preserves about 90% of what we know about Laurence. 82.6.77.75 (talk) 13:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've clarified that it's a quote and translation from Decarreaux. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It still is presented as a direct (translated) quote from a document written by Laurence (presumably originally in Latin). At the very least, "Celts" is a modern substitute for some other term in the original which would have been more specific...people in Laurence's time did not see the British and Irish as being divisions of a single people, and did not use the Greek term "keltoi" or its latin derivative to describe either of them. I'm more than a bit suspicious that the "quote" is invented... are you sure Decarreaux intends it to be taken literally, rather than as Decarreaux's summary of the attitude of Augustine & co? If so, what specific document does he claim to be quoting? 82.6.77.75 (talk) 16:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the quote comes from a very early revision of the article, if it's that big a deal, it can be removed. Des doesn't give a source for the quote, but he does indeed give it quotation marks, implying that it is Laurence's words. The exact bit is "In 609, Bishop Laurence, Augustine's successor, complained that Bishop Dagan refused to sit at his table or to sleep under his roof. Laurence himself did not conceal his bitterness: "The small number of Celts, living at the world's ends, cannot claim to know better than all the Churches of Christendom." A century later the Welsh Christians still refused to pray in the same churches as the Latins, or to share their meals." (p. 261). Ealdgyth - Talk 16:39, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, Decarreaux seems to have garbled this. The complaint about Dagan is correctly attributed to Laurence (Bede, book 2 ch 4) but the quoted text seems to be based on a later chapter of Bede recounting a letter of Pope Honorius to the Scots in 634 AD. From the Penguin classics translation:
"He [Honorius] earnestly warned them [the Scots] not to imagine that their little community, isolated at the uttermost ends of the earth, had a wisdom exceeding that of all churches ancient and modern throughout the world..." (Bede, book 2 ch 19).
close enough that this seems to be what Decarreaux had in mind. Obviously this is not relevant here since Honorius wrote 20 years after Laurence's death. Is this important? Fairly, because if we describe the controversy as "Romans" vs. "Celts" we are not recounting history but 19th-century nationalist mythology. So I'm deleting this sentence. 82.6.77.75 (talk) 17:50, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Laurence of Canterbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]