Talk:Lasswade

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lasswade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:45, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lasswade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What sort of "parish"?[edit]

@Tom1955:

The article begins

Lasswade is a village and parish in Midlothian, Scotland, on the River North Esk,

I thought I understood that. But the further I read in the article, the more uncertain I was. See, I'm American, and over here "parish" almost always means a type of ecclesiastical administrative unit, a subunit of a diocese. The state of Louisiana calls its first-level subunits parishes, but all the other states have counties (except Alaska, which has boroughs).

The article offers no explicit indication that Lasswade is not an ecclesiastical parish. So I'm going to change the first use of the word to "civil parish". That way, both the word "civil" and the link will serve to distinguish this parish from ecclesiastical parishes.

I see that you have worked on other pages for places in the UK. Perhaps you and other interested editors can check such pages for this assumption of what the reader knows, and similarly change parish to [[civil parish]] at its first use. In fact, this might well be an appropriate task for WP:UK geography and WP: Ireland. --Thnidu (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After reading this discussion I noticed that the first mention of "parish" in this article was not "civil parish." Looking through the history of the article I could not find the time or justification for the reversion, so I added "civil" and the link back in as I think this point is well taken. If there was a reason for the reversion please let me know. Thank you. Worriedwallace (talk) 16:40, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]