Talk:Landmark Trust

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

To make the list comprehensive, would it be better to define a category rather than maintain this list, which is constrained as a list of places open on a particular day. jrbray

I've tried to make the lists comprehensive but don't know how to work the categories so perhaps someone more wiki-literate than me could have a go at that? Infilms 16:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done it - see Category:Landmark Trust properties in the United Kingdom Saga City 14:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just the jobby - thank you Infilms 19:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

A merge of the content of Manifold Trust was proposed here, but the proposer seemed to be a bit confused as to the procedure. If the content is deleted before it is merged then there will be nothing left to merge, and after merger there needs to be a redirect both to guide readers to the correct article and to maintain the attribution history for copyright purposes. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why would we possibly want to merge articles on two different organisations, even though they have similar goals? Andy Dingley (talk) 20:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Quite. Fortunately it seems to have gone away. DBaK (talk) 21:58, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is there a procedure for speedily deleting merge proposals that we can use? S a g a C i t y (talk) 09:11, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

National Trust[edit]

Different role to the National Trust – if so, what? This needs mentioning/explaining, as neither page explains their relationship to one another, or why both exist, leaving readers none the wiser. Jimthing (talk) 19:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landmark Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722070224/http://sherpa.bl.uk/42/01/philatelicresearchbl.pdf to http://sherpa.bl.uk/42/01/philatelicresearchbl.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landmark Trust. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160815060330/http://www.landmarktrust.org.uk/Documents/Annual%20Reports%20and%20Reviews/Landmark_AnnualReview2016_20APR.pdf to http://www.landmarktrust.org.uk/Documents/Annual%20Reports%20and%20Reviews/Landmark_AnnualReview2016_20APR.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]