Talk:Lamentations of Jeremiah the Prophet

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Merger with Tenebrae[edit]

I hadn't thought of this and don't feel myself expert enough on the liturgical side to make a lot of noise about it, but in general it seems like it might be a good idea. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 21:26, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, let's please not merge. The musical settings of the text, and the history of their musical settings, are a separate subject from the service itself, as they are a separate subject from the actual book of the Old Testament. See here for a related discussion containing a cogent argument against merging related articles on Psalm 130 and De profundis. In order for these articles to develop properly, and stay focused on their subjects, it's better to keep them separate and well-linked. Thanks, Antandrus (talk) 21:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Antandrus - no. What's gained?. (And just think, if we go further down this route, how much would end up bundled under the various feast days...) Bob aka Linuxlad 07:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm changing my vote...you both know about the issues and I was speaking out of misty ignorance. No merger, please. --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 00:19, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was no consensus for merger. I've removed the merger tag. Dgf32 (talk) 20:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lamentations of Jeremiah the Prophet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]