Talk:Lambton College

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Specify Canada?[edit]

Surely you need Canada in either the title or the top lines?vcxlor 05:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Campus Architecture[edit]

I think it should be noted that the original building on campus looks to be an example of brutalist architecture. I am unsure what the new technology building would be classified as.

The 'lambtonmarketing' user should have access to images of the college that would look good, and they could determine if they could be contributed. I may look through my own photographs and might have something.

FlowRate (talk) 02:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Homage Artist[edit]

You are allowing someone who has sour grapes to continually post inaccurate information about an event. The student body has asked that you discontinue allowing this individual to use your site to portray the College in a negative inaccurate light.

The student body knows precious little about this topic, and quite frankly would not care. This is accurate information, you will notice everything present is referenced from third party sources and is factual. If you have an issue present something specific here with references or else and changes you make will be continually reverted. Iæfai (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article appears to be accurately sited and unbiased. The act of altering the article appears to be only from the college IP address itself. This is a conflict of interest and the IP address should not be allowed to edit this article. Red3biggs (talk) 21:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This article is not up to WP standards and reads like a poorly written advertisement. I removed excess detail seriously: "shared rooms include two beds, two armoires, two desks, one bathroom, one microwave, one mini-fridge, telephone and cable hook-up and wireless internet." Who thought this was encyclopedic? The anecdote about the first tour, is it in a secondary source? Speaking of sources, this article has virtually none. Doesn't the local newspaper even write articles about the college? Much of the material in the article is unsourced and subject to removal. The numbers in the article need to be quantified and sourced "over" and "more than" are not acceptable especially without sources. Just as a reminder sources should be secondary. The Buildings and features section needs to be written as prose (I strongly suspect cut and paste copyright violation) and sourced. - - MrBill3 (talk) 21:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Possible sources for article:

  • "Eves government announces $2.9 million for Sarnia's Lambton College Skills Training Program" (Press release). Ontario: Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Employment. 11 April 2003.
  • "Shell Canada supports student initiatives at Lambton College" (Press release). Shell Canada. 13 April 2007.
  • Booth, JD (13 September 2013). "Lambton College receives $5m in project funding from feds". LambtonShield.com.
  • Booth, JD (12 September 2013). "Lambton College Firefighters come home from Edmonton with world records". LambtonShield.com.
  • Booth, JD (14 April 2011). "And the survey says…Lambton College is doing a good job". LambtonShield.com.
  • Booth, JD (15 December 2011). "Lambton College grad working on cutting edge biomass research projects". LambtonShield.com.

At this point JD at the shield may be overcited in the article.

- - MrBill3 (talk) 23:12, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lambton College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]