Talk:Lake Onalaska

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Lake Onalaska is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Lake Onalaska/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

== Main Weakneses == The main weakness of this article is that the references cited are not academic in nature. The article is largely based on secondary sources writen by non-historians, especially non-local historians. Also, there is too much emphasis on the settlement known as Onalaska rather than the actual reservoir (manmade lake) known as Lake Onalaska. That is where the novice who has not seen the actual plat, the claims, and the local deed record gets into trouble. In other words, concentrate on Depression Era history and the construction of the lake. If emphasis is put on the nomenclature and founding of the original village (years before the village, now city was founded) the article can be picked apart by knowledgeable local historians pretty quickly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.187.112.18 (talk) 11:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:39, 17 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 21:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lake Onalaska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mississippi River vs. Black River[edit]

The rewritten article still gives the reader the idea that the City of Onalaska is directly adjacent to the Mississippi River. The former townsite, village and city of Onalaska, Wisconsin was and is located on the Black River, not the Mississippi. The flowage of the Black River still exists, even with the construction of Lake Onalaska. The Black River empties into the Mississippi River far to the south, in the City of La Crosse, not Onalaska. The nearby cities of La Crosse, Wisconsin and Winona, Minnesota can be considered Mississippi river towns; Onalaska cannot. All three, however, can be considered, historically, lumber towns.

The myth that the eastern shore of the Mississippi somehow borders Onalaska was spread by (1) repeated mistakes found on the internet and (2) non-native locals who do not know the geography and history of the place where they currently live.