Talk:Lady Mary Victoria Douglas-Hamilton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This lady should be known as Her Serene Highness Mary of Monaco, Grafine Festetics de Tolna, or more appropriately by her birthname: Lady Mary Victoria Douglas-Hamilton. It is rather disgusting that this encylopædia does not give relevant people there specific dignity. I will change this article's name at some point in the future, unless there is a serious reason not to presented. Brendandh 21:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider the following applicable Wiki conventions before making changes:
  1. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Other royals #9.
  2. Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)#Other non-royal names #6
  3. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Honorific prefixes Lethiere 00:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As her marriage with Prince Albert I was dissolved, she cannot be Her Serene Highness (Princess) Mary of Monaco. 90.52.63.205 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How could she have married her second husband on 2 June 1880 when the srticle states that she divorced Louis on 28 July 1880. Are you suggesting she was a bigamist ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.98.196 (talk) 17:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the marriage was annuled by the Church in January 1880, the July date is that of the Prince's Order, by which the marriage was declared to be dissolved in Monaco. Yours --Poko (talk) 09:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think she should be referred to as Douglas-Hamilton.. I understood that it was her brother, the 12the Duke who started using the surname Doudlas Hamilton and that therefore she was born Lady Mary Victoria Hamilton. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Royalpirate (talkcontribs) 12:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Festetics Mausoleum[edit]

I understand that the current mausoleum, apparently known as the 'New Mausoleum' replaced the original, which fell into disrepair. Does anyone know if the Festetic family members interred there remain under the present structure? Shipsview (talk) 10:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Descendants[edit]

Am I alone in thinking that the descendants are a fascinating part of the story of a Scotswoman's contribution to European history and should not have been removed from the article? Shipsview (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]