Talk:Ladislav Hecht

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ladislav Hecht. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:34, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits[edit]

An editor made problematic edits here.

1. He failed to stick with what the ref says, and what the wikipedia article is entitled. His bastardization of them to state something quite different is not proper editing.

2. To link "United States" is overlinking. Which we should not engage in.

3. The same problem with 1, when he basterdized what the source says - for no good reason to delete the reference to the Nazi invasion of Czechoslovakia. Is that something he wishes to hide? This editing is quite odd. The source supports what was stated.

4. I would urge him not to edit m for minor in his edit summary, when engaging in deletions or significant changes to the edits of other editors. While I am of course certain it was not his intention, editors could think that he is trying to conceal problematic edits. --2604:2000:E010:1100:7472:3DB5:41A0:11EB (talk) 03:44, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I doubt there would be any problematic edit.
1 - excuse me, what kind of bastardization are you talking about? Close pharaphrasing is allowed and accuracy is also important.
2 - how could it be overlinking if that is the only link to it in the main text?
3 - I kept references, or even re-added some, if something disappeared, may be by mistake, I don't wish to hide anything, but accurately the Munich Agreement assigned part of Czechoslovakia to Germany, while later the country broke up and the Czech rump state joined as a Protectorate to Germany, there was not any one-time occupation event as your wordage would insist.
4 - Sorry, no significant changes were made in the article, practically two linkings and one sentence-plus paraphrasing.(KIENGIR (talk) 04:03, 29 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]