Talk:Lacaille 8760
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
AX Microscopium?[edit]
Shouldn't that be "AX Microscopii" (using the genitive plural of the constellation's name)?
Infobox Luminosity is wrong[edit]
According to luminosity
When not qualified, luminosity means bolometric luminosity
but the value 0.028 is obviously derived from the absolute visual magnitude, and is therefore not bolometric. Qemist (talk) 12:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Largest and Brightest Red Dwarf known?![edit]
Since HIP 12961 has a mass of 0.63 solar masses, a radius 0.68 ± 0.03 of the Sun, an absolute magnitude of +7.8 and is of spectral type M0, then it's obviously a more powerful star than Lacaille 8760. CrackDragon (talk) 09:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)