Talk:Léopold Sédar Senghor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Honors mixup[edit]

The section on honors is misleading in not differentiating clearly between the ASA and the NYASA. Those are two comletely seperate organisations, which nevertheless both award a "Distinguished Africanist Award" (confusingly so); ASA being (to my knowledge) the far more renowned. I found the cited IPS article of ref. 7 on an H-Net board (http://www.h-net.org/~africa/threads/litthread.html), and it deals indeed with the 1995(!) NYASA-award going to Senghor (confirmed by NYASA: http://www.nyasa.org/about/awards.html). If Senghor was ever awarded the 1994 ASA-Award, it would have been revoked afterwards, since the ASA-webpage lists its 1994 award as "May Not Have Been Awarded" (http://www.africanstudies.org/p/cm/ld/fid=26). Now that would indeed be interesting... but since I couldn't find anything else on this I'd rather think this is a mixup. Does anybody know anything on this? If not I'll double check and then change the section accordingly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.65.129.213 (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Request for evaluation[edit]

This article was added to the request to be evaluated list, but I would not recommend changing the rating from start at this time. I would recommend requesting a peer review for some detailed suggestions. Some good starting points to improve the article would be to expand the lead paragraph and improve the citations for the article, adding a "References" section. Reading through the help pages on what makes a good article will point you in the right direction. Looks like a potentially very interesting article. Nightngle 20:21, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Buried in Dakar[edit]

It seems that Léopold Sédar Senghor is not buried in Joal, but in Dakar

  • [1] (pdf, note 14 page 15)
  • [2] "Dans l'après-midi, le corps de Léopold Sédar Senghor sera enterré au cimetière catholique de Bel-Air à Dakar"
  • [3] "Léopold Sédar Senghor a été enterré à Dakar, dans l’intimité, aux côtés de son fils Philippe Maguilien Senghor"

--ArséniureDeGallium 13:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation[edit]

I translated most parts of the french article into english. Please feel free to offer any comment on the translation as it was my first experience at it. Claveau 22:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

essay like[edit]

most encyclopedic articles dont have a summary and unles we're french or translate the poem it's kinda useless. Needs work but there are plenty of articles in that catagory now isn't there?

It was already there when I added the translation from the French article, it might not be necessary so feel free to delete it I guess... Claveau 09:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sir?[edit]

The article began with "Sir Léopold Sédar Senghor ..." That must have been a mistake, surely? I took the "Sir" out, anyway. Andrew Dalby 12:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vive La France?[edit]

There is no mention of this in the source listed for this claim:

Front Stalag 230 was reserved for colonial troops captured during the war. German soldiers wanted to execute him and the others the same day they were captured, but they escaped this fate by yelling Vive la France, vive l'Afrique noire! ("Long live France, long live Black Africa!") A French officer told the soldiers that executing the African prisoners would dishonour the Aryan race and the German Army. In total, Senghor spent two years in different prison camps, where he spent most of his time writing poems.

The source does not mention which camp he was interned in or how he escaped. Where did this information come from? Because it did not come from the "Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Africa and the Middle East" Information on Senghor can be found on page 626. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.24.148.8 (talk) 16:06, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The whole story sounds like the usual hatemongering against Germans. I mean Senghor even read Frobenius in captivity, Blacks did play in German movies of that time etc. --41.151.47.195 (talk) 17:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Léopold Sédar Senghor/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

An interesting article. The lack of citations keeps the rating as "Start", this is not a negative but an opportunity to add content that will expand and enrich this article. It is certainly notable and a valuable addition to the Wikipedia biographies.Nightngle 20:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 22:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 8 May 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No Consensus.The arguments from both the sides are persuasive enough.(non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 09:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Léopold Sédar SenghorLéopold Senghor – The common name is Léopold Senghor. While some sources do refer to him as Léopold Sédar Senghor, the majority of sources refer him as just Léopold Senghor. Source - [4] (Encyclopædia Britannica), [5] (The Guardian), [6] (NYT), [7] (The Telegraph), [8] (The Economist) and [9] (Washington Post). Jupitus Smart 07:08, 8 May 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. Winged Blades Godric 09:03, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose per WP:TITLECHANGES plus usage which seems to be about even according to this Google Ngram. (I realize some sources use both in the same article.) Even the cited sources are not consistent (e.g. The Guardian, Washington Post). —  AjaxSmack  21:42, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The sources cited are from high quality publications, suggesting they favour the shorter form. Furthermore, if the two titles are equally prevalent, as in the ngram mentioned above, then we should choose the shorter form per WP:CONCISE. Finally, I'm not sure what WP:TITLECHANGES has to do with this. That seems to be just a section about how the RM process works, there's nothing there that would tell us to favour one form or the other here. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 09:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Léopold Sédar Senghor which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 07:15, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Léopold Sédar Senghor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Léopold Sédar Senghor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Léopold Sédar Senghor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]