Talk:Kotodama

Etymology section is not

That section begins with The etymology of kotodama is uncertain, but the previous section tells us exactly the etymology of the word, so maybe somebody doesn't know what etymology means. It then goes on to explain about some allegedly related words in Japanese, but the entire section seems useless and unneeded to me. Still, I don't feel like just deleting it, because somebody will probably get pissed. Perhaps someone can come and edit it to make it more sensible, and retitle the section. Himatsu Bushi (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Low importance?

I have no clue why this article is tagged as "low importance". Kotodama is one of key concept of Shinto and influenced Japanese culture throughout. It has affected people's daily life as well as literature. Some conventions were based on this notion. I would like to know the rationale why this article is marked as "low importance". --Aphaia 04:12, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Anime is Japan

I would like to remove the popular reference section, but it seems like Wikipedians are congenitally incapable of writing anything about Japan without adding a list of references to anime... Konamaiki (talk) 22:01, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

It is pretty sad that half the article is dedicated to such unimportant trivia like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.243.126.7 (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Popculture cruft is horrrific. I'm going to take the bold approach and remove it. Yunshui ^雲_水 10:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kotodama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071209213050/http://www.aikidojournal.com/encyclopedia?entryID=428 to http://www.aikidojournal.com/encyclopedia?entryID=428

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 12 December 2017 (UTC)