Talk:Konstantin Pobedonostsev

Russia: Science & education / History / Religion High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the religion in Russia task force.

Biography: Politics and Government B‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Philosophy: Philosophers Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers

Christianity: Eastern O. C‑class Top‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as Top-importance).

Religion C‑class Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The article gives two conflicting versions of his patronymic. It is correctly 'Petrovich.'

I don't see any mention Pobedonostsev was the offical censor. Burning of books, etc., etc.... Peters 05:44, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Came across some more good information in doing other research, incorporated. — Pēters J. Vecrumba 02:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Married? Children? Holy Orders?[edit]

Did he receive Holy Orders? Was he married? Did he have any children? -- 217.190.205.250 19:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English grammatical usage in the text[edit]

As so often in articles composed in or translated into English principally by speakers of Slavic languages this Wiki-entry is riddled with errors in the usage of the definite and indefinite (and especially the 'omitted' plural indefinite) article, to the point where, in a number of instances, the sense of the text is obscured. In the past I've attempted clean-ups in such circumstances, but have found the procedure so tedious and time-consuming that I have frequently given up. Why are East European speakers and writers of English, who in other respects appear to have good competence in English, apparently so unaware of this very fundamental aspect of the grammar of the English language? As a language teacher myself, I find these lapses so annoying: it is basic to correct English usage, something I would teach, and din by rote into a foreign learner of English from day1! 86.137.148.195 (talk) 09:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My case precisely. Yours truly, native Russian speaker, learnt vernacular spoken English around nine years old, lived a few years in English-speaking countries, worked around ten years in English-speaking environment ... I don't feel any difficulty speaking correctly (perhaps because my real-world profession requires thinking in English most of the time), but writing oh writing ... yes, definite articles are the greatest nuisance (punctuation a distant second). So I have to disagree with your last premise: it's not so simple, it's counterintuitive and unlike spelling irregularities it cannot be easily learnt through a drill. 78.107.117.194 (talk) 05:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

19:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry to tag onto this comment, but I don't see the option to create a new comment. Regarding the article, many statements are not cited or verified. A few references are listed at the end and are used in the text, but much is stated without substantiation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aimzzz (talk • contribs) 19:46, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong link?[edit]

The second footnote, http://books.google.com/books?id=W8ETvpyQ26wC&pg=PA23&dq=pobedonostsev+reactionary#PPA23,M1, which is supposed to say something about many people thinking of him as a conservative seems to go nowhere. New one? 82.217.116.224 (talk) 15:26, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Konstantin Pobedonostsev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]