Talk:Knightscope

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled[edit]

This article is terribly written. Many of the statements contradict themselves, the grammar is sub-par, and a large number of citations are broken. I'm tempted to go in here and rip the majority of this stuff out so we can start over with a clean-ish slate. My favorites, btw, are the bits about collecting 90 TB of data per day using infrared light, and "detect[ing] objects 24 hours long."

"Optical character recognition" refers to the recognition of letters 107.146.196.173 (talk) 08:29, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-Would it be off-color to replace all instances of "People" with "It has been speculated" or "One might speculate" I especially think speculation has no place in an encyclopedia, but it's better than referring to the same source a certain politician uses to make baseless statements. Jeffman12 (talk) 00:19, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Reference[edit]

One of the references ( ""Knightscope technology"". Knightscope, Inc. Retrieved 29 October 2014.) currently leads to a page not found error. I don't know what the protocol for this is, I just thought someone who does should know Deadlyops (talk) 20:42, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Knightscope. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

advertisement[edit]

Is it really fair to call this an advertisement? Theres a large section on criticism and the rest of the article is really just general info that isnt really that promotional in nature. Wikiman5676 (talk) 18:59, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As there is no response, and i have made some changes to the page including adding some encyclopedic content. I have removed the tag. Wikiman5676 (talk) 00:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]