Talk:Knaresborough

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Knaresborough is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merger of Knaresborough town mayor[edit]

In broad terms, this is a non-notable office, unsupported by citations under general notability guidelines and we don't appear to do this for any other town in the UK. Accordingly, this list should be merged to this article. Rodhull andemu 22:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Agree; Ten days and counting I would say, with the facts given and no other objections, there would be reason to boldly merge the two. Otr500 (talk) 07:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of article[edit]

Given the repeated unwanted additions about the Town Crier, by the anon ip editor (who has already received a short-trem block for this), should the article now be protected in some way? Most other editors seem to agree that the post of Town Crier is notable enough to be included in the article, possibly even the name of the current Town Crier, but nothing more seems to be warranted. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:13, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 26 March 2013[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change Knaresborough City to Knaresborough Town because Knaresborough is a Town and not a City. Thank you 176.248.66.24 (talk) 10:36, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. - unable to locate this in the article please specify exactly where the change is required. Keith D (talk) 12:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Knaresborough/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Add further references
Add more photographs
Investigate the {{confusing}} tag
Maybe could be restructured by switching sections round see WP:UKCITIES

Keith D 15:19, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 10:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 21:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Knaresborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927213720/http://www.harrogate.gov.uk/pdf/HBCDatafile04_pt2.pdf to http://www.harrogate.gov.uk/pdf/HBCDatafile04_pt2.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.knaresborough.co.uk/castle/history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:11, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Yard riot, 26 June 1866[edit]

A notable event in local history apparently: [1]. The commemorative tankard mentioned appeared on BBC's Antiques Roadshow on 24 September 2017: [2]. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:41, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Knaresborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]