Talk:Klaipėda LNG terminal

Lithuania Low‑importance

	Lithuania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

}}

Merge proposal[edit]

I propose to merge FSRU Independence into this article. These are two short article about closely related topics. Beagel (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a separate article about FSRU Independence as it is both widely commented on in Media, is a large and complicated ship and is of huge importance for the energy supply of the Baltic countries.

So if at all needed, there should then also be a separate article about the shore facilities. Ulflarsen (talk) 14:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This vessel is an integral part of the terminal. All this information about the LNG supply to the Baltic states belongs to the article about the terminal, not about the ship. There is a significant overlapping. Beagel (talk) 18:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Klaipėda LNG FSRU. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141027171638/http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-10-27/lithuania-grabs-lng-in-effort-to-curb-russian-dominance to http://www.businessweek.com/news/2014-10-27/lithuania-grabs-lng-in-effort-to-curb-russian-dominance

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rename Proposal[edit]

Suggest remaining the article to Klaipėda LNG Terminal - as stated by current terminal owner and operator Klaipedos Nafta the terminal consist of three elements "floating storage regasification unit (FSRU) named Independence, a berth and a gas pipeline". LNG FSRU Independence although the biggest part of the terminal has another dedicated page FSRU Independence, while this page should refer to all three elements which collectively are perceived as Klaipėda LNG Terminal. Moreover, the price figure stipulated in this very page is a cost of the referred berth and pipeline and not the FSRU LNG Independence itself as it is being leased. FSRU Independence suggests that the ship costs approximately $300 MM which is almost three times as the figure provided in this page. 78.56.37.40 (talk)Passerby — Preceding undated comment added 16:01, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]